首页> 外文期刊>Harvard international law journal >The Limits of Moral Limitations: Reconceptualizing 'Morals' in Human Rights Law
【24h】

The Limits of Moral Limitations: Reconceptualizing 'Morals' in Human Rights Law

机译:道德限制的极限:在人权法中康复“道德”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Each of the major human rights instruments from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights onwards has reserved the state's ability to curtail some rights in the name of interests in national security, public health, public order, and morals. These instruments do not define "morals," however, and the growing recognition that sexual rights are human rights has made the deferential application of these limitation clauses increasingly untenable. As regional and international institutions struggle to make sense of moral limitations, this Article argues that constitutional morality, a concept developed by domestic courts in the Global South, offers a promising doctrinal tool to adjudicate disputes over sovereignty and sexual rights.
机译:来自世界人权宣言的每个主要人权文书都保留了该州以国家安全,公共卫生,公共秩序和道德的利益名义减少了一些权利的能力。 然而,这些文书不界定“道德”,而性权利是人权的越来越高的认可使得这些限制条款越来越无法掌握。 作为区域和国际机构努力造成道德限制的意识,本文认为,宪法道德是全球南部国内法院制定的概念,提供了一个有希望的教义工具,可以裁定对主权和性权利的纠纷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号