...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart and vessels: An international journal >Coronary sinus catheter placement via left cubital vein for phrenic nerve stimulation during pulmonary vein isolation
【24h】

Coronary sinus catheter placement via left cubital vein for phrenic nerve stimulation during pulmonary vein isolation

机译:冠状动脉窦导管通过左侧静脉静脉置于肺静脉分离期间的膈神经刺激

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Phrenic nerve (PN) stimulation is essential for the elimination of PN palsy during balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Although ultrasound-guided vascular access is safe, insertion of a PN stimulation catheter via central venous access carries a potential risk of the development of mechanical complications. We evaluated the safety of a left cubital vein approach for positioning a 20-electrode atrial cardioversion (BeeAT) catheter in the coronary sinus (CS), and the feasibility of right PN pacing from the superior vena cava (SVC) using proximal electrodes of the BeeAT catheter. In total, 106 consecutive patients who underwent balloon-based PVI with a left cubital vein approach for BeeAT catheter positioning were retrospectively assessed. The left cubital approach was successful in 105 patients (99.1%), and catheter insertion into the CS was possible for 104 patients (99.0%). Among these patients, constant right PN pacing from the SVC was obtained for 89 patients (89/104, 85.6%). In five patients, transient loss of right PN capture occurred during right pulmonary vein ablation. No persistent right PN palsy was observed. Small subcutaneous hemorrhage was observed in eight patients (7.5%). Neuropathy, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and perforations associated with the left cubital approach were not detected. Body mass index was significantly higher in the right PN pacing failure group than in the right PN pacing success group (26.2 +/- 3.2 vs. 23.8 +/- 3.8; P = 0.025). CS catheter placement with a left cubital vein approach for right PN stimulation was found to be safe and feasible. Right PN pacing from the SVC using a BeeAT catheter was successfully achieved in the majority of the patients. This approach may prove to be preferable for non-obese patients.
机译:膈神经(PN)刺激对于在基于球囊的肺静脉分离(PVI)期间消除PN麻痹是必不可少的。虽然超声引导的血管进入是安全的,但是通过中央静脉进入插入PN刺激导管携带机械并发症的发育的潜在风险。我们评估了将左侧静脉静脉方法定位在冠状动脉窦(CS)中定位20个电极心房心致(BEEAT)导管的安全性,以及使用近端电极从上腔静脉(SVC)的右PN起搏的可行性塞特导管。回顾性评估了总共有106名接受基于球囊的PVI的PVI的患者,用于切除凹部导管定位的左侧静脉法。左侧立方体方法在105名患者中成功(99.1%),并且104名患者的导管插入CS(99.0%)。在这些患者中,获得了SVC的恒定右侧PN起搏,为89名患者(89/104,85.6%)。在五名患者中,临时肺静脉消融期间发生右侧PN捕获的瞬态丧失。没有观察到持续右侧的PALSY。在8名患者中观察到小皮下出血(7.5%)。没有发现神经病变,伪肿瘤,动静脉瘘和与左侧跨度方法相关的穿孔。右侧PN起搏失效组体重指数显着高于PN PNAING成功组(26.2 +/- 3.2与23.8 +/- 3.8; P = 0.025)。 CS导管用左侧静脉静脉刺激的静脉刺激的静脉刺激被发现是安全可行的。在大多数患者中成功地实现了使用乳头导管的SVC从SVC开始的右PN。这种方法可能证明是非肥胖患者的优选。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号