首页> 外文期刊>Health economics >Income‐rich and wealth‐poor? The impact of measures of socio‐economic status in the analysis of the distribution of long‐term care use among older people
【24h】

Income‐rich and wealth‐poor? The impact of measures of socio‐economic status in the analysis of the distribution of long‐term care use among older people

机译:收入丰富和财富穷人? 社会经济地位措施对老年人长期护理分布分析的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract This article aims to investigate the impact of using 2 measures of socio‐economic status on the analysis of how informal care and home care use are distributed among older people living in the community. Using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe for 14 European countries, we estimate differences in corrected concentration indices for use of informal care and home care, using equivalised household net income and equivalised net worth (as a proxy for wealth). We also calculate horizontal inequity indices using both measures of socio‐economic status and accounting for differences in need. The findings show that using wealth as a ranking variable results, as a rule, in a less pro‐poor inequality of use for both informal and home care. Once differences in need are controlled for (horizontal inequity), wealth still results in a less pro‐poor distribution for informal care, in comparison with income, whereas the opposite is observed for home care. Possible explanations for these differences and research and policy implications are discussed.
机译:摘要本文旨在调查使用2种社会经济地位对非正式护理和家庭护理如何分配在社区的老年人之间的影响。使用来自欧洲欧洲欧洲卫生,老龄和退休调查的数据,我们估计矫正非正式护理和家庭护理的纠正集中指数的差异,使用等效的家庭净收入和等效的净值(作为财富代理) 。我们还使用社会经济地位的措施计算水平不公平指数,并考虑有需要的差异。调查结果表明,通常使用财富作为排名变量结果,以非正式和家庭护理的使用不等式较低。一旦需要所需的差异(水平不公平),与收入相比,财富仍然导致非正式护理的分布较差,而在家庭护理中观察到相反。讨论了对这些差异和研究和政策影响的可能解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号