首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice
【24h】

Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice

机译:通过初级保健跨学科团队实施社区参与:在实践中的爱尔兰案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Community participation in primary care is enshrined in international and Irish health policy. However, there is a lack of evidence about how stakeholders work collectively to implement community participation within interdisciplinary teams; community perspectives are rarely captured, and a theoretical underpinning for implementation of community participation in primary care is absent. Objective To conduct a theoretically informed, multiperspectival empirical analysis of the implementation of community participation via primary care teams ( PCT s) in Ireland. Methods/Design/Participants Participatory learning and action ( PLA ) focus groups and interviews were held with 39 participants across four case study sites within a nationally funded programme designed to enable disadvantaged communities to participate in primary care. Normalization process theory ( NPT ) informed data generation and analysis of how diverse stakeholder groups worked together to implement community participation via PCT s. Results The various stakeholders had a shared understanding of the value of community participation on PCT s. Motivations to get involved in this work varied, but were strong overall. Challenges to enacting community participation on PCT s included problems with the functioning of PCT s and a lack of clarity and confidence in the role of community representatives at PCT meetings. Informal appraisals were positive, but formal appraisal was limited. Discussion and Conclusion The implementation and sustainability of community participation on PCT s in Ireland will be limited unless (i) the functioning of PCT s is strong, (ii) there is increased confidence and clarity on community representatives’ roles among all health‐care professionals, and (iii) more sophisticated methods for formal appraisal are used.
机译:摘要背景社区参与初级保健的参与是在国际和爱尔兰卫生政策中的。但是,缺乏有关利益相关者如何集体工作以在跨学科团队内实施社区参与的证据;很少被捕获社区观点,并且缺席了社区参与初级保健的理论基础。目的是通过爱尔兰的初级保健团队(PCT)在理论上知情,多季度实证对社区参与实施的实证分析。方法/设计/参与者参与式学习和行动(PLA)焦点小组和访谈在四个案例研究网站中举行了39个参与者,该网站内的国家资助方案,旨在使弱势社区能够参与初级保健。规范化过程理论(NPT)知情数据生成和分析各种利益相关者群体如何通过PCT S执行社区参与。结果各利益相关者对社区参与PCT的价值进行了共同的认识。参与这项工作的动机各种各样,但整体都很强劲。挑战社区参与PCT的挑战包括PCT S的运作问题以及对PCT会议上社区代表的角色缺乏清晰度和信心。非正式评估是积极的,但正式评估有限。讨论与结论,除非(i)PCT S强劲的运作,否则讨论和结论对爱尔兰PCT的实施和可持续性将有限,(i) (III)使用更复杂的正式评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号