首页> 外文期刊>Health education research >Exploring political influences on evidence-based non-communicable disease prevention across four countries
【24h】

Exploring political influences on evidence-based non-communicable disease prevention across four countries

机译:探讨四个国家循证循证非传染病预防的政治影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Implementation of evidence-based practices can improve efficiency and effectiveness of public health efforts. Few studies have explored the political contextual factors that impact implementation of evidence-based non-communicable disease prevention (EBNCDP). This study aimed to do so in Australia, Brazil, China and the United States. Investigators conducted 10-13 qualitative, semi-structured interviews of public health practitioners working in functionally similar public health organizations in each country (total N = 50). Study participants were identified through purposive sampling and interviews were structured around an interview guide covering six domains related to EBNCDP. Interviewees from all four countries identified funding as the primary politically-influenced barrier to implementing EBNCDP. Similarly widespread barriers included government funding priorities that shift based on who is in power and the difficulty of convincing policy-makers and funders that non-communicable disease prevention is a wise investment of political capital. Policymakers who are not evidence-driven was another common barrier even in the United States and Australia, where EBNCDP is more established. Findings suggest that political contextual factors influence EBNCDP and vary to an extent by country, though certain factors seem to be universal. This can aid public health practitioners, political leaders, and policymakers in advocating for conditions and policies that encourage evidence-based practice.
机译:基于证据的实践的实施可以提高公共卫生努力的效率和有效性。少数研究探索了影响循证非传染病预防(EBNCDP)的政治背景因素。这项研究旨在在澳大利亚,巴西,中国和美国这样做。调查人员在每个国家/地区在功能相似的公共卫生组织工作的公共卫生从业者的10-13个定性,半结构化访谈(总N = 50)。学习参与者通过有目的的抽样来确定,并在面试指南周围构建了面试,涵盖与EBNCDP相关的六个域名。来自所有四个国家的受访者确定了资金,因为主要政治影响了eBNCDP的障碍。类似地,广泛的障碍包括基于谁的政府资助优先事项,基于谁处于权力,难以令人信服的政策制定者和资助者,即非传染性疾病预防是政治资本的明智投资。不是证据驱动的政策制定者即使在美国和澳大利亚也是另一个常见的障碍,eBncdp更加成立。调查结果表明,政治上的语境因素影响EBNCDP并因国家而异,尽管某些因素似乎是普遍的。这可以帮助公共卫生从业者,政治领导人和政策制定者倡导鼓励基于证据的条件和政策。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Health education research》 |2018年第2期|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Washington Univ Brown Sch Prevent Res Ctr St Louis One Brookings Dr St Louis MO 63130 USA;

    5261 Univ Oregon Coll Educ Univ Oregon Eugene OR 97403 USA;

    Harvard Univ TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth Massachusetts Hall Cambridge MA 02138 USA;

    Washington Univ Brown Sch Prevent Res Ctr St Louis One Brookings Dr St Louis MO 63130 USA;

    Univ Melbourne Melbourne Sch Populat &

    Global Hlth Parkville Vic 3010 Australia;

    Univ Melbourne Melbourne Sch Populat &

    Global Hlth Parkville Vic 3010 Australia;

    Washington Univ Brown Sch Prevent Res Ctr St Louis One Brookings Dr St Louis MO 63130 USA;

    Hong Kong Polytech Univ Kowloon Hong Kong Peoples R China;

    Tongji Univ Shanghai Peoples R China;

    Univ Melbourne Melbourne Sch Populat &

    Global Hlth Parkville Vic 3010 Australia;

    Univ Fed Parana St Coracao Maria 92 Curitiba Parana Brazil;

    Tongji Univ Shanghai Peoples R China;

    Hong Kong Polytech Univ Kowloon Hong Kong Peoples R China;

    Washington Univ Brown Sch Prevent Res Ctr St Louis One Brookings Dr St Louis MO 63130 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 学校管理;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号