首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures
【24h】

Comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI and chemical-shift imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral body fractures

机译:弥散加权磁共振成像和化学位移成像在鉴别椎体良恶性骨折中的定性和定量评估的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the diagnostic value of qualitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), quantitative DWI, and chemical-shift imaging in a single prospective cohort of patients with acute osteoporotic and malignant vertebral fractures. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study group was composed of patients with 26 osteoporotic vertebral fractures (18 women, eight men; mean age, 69 years; age range, 31 years 6 months to 86 years 2 months) and 20 malignant vertebral fractures (nine women, 11 men; mean age, 63.4 years; age range, 24 years 8 months to 86 years 4 months). T1-weighted, STIR, and T2-weighted sequences were acquired at 1.5 T. A DW reverse fast imaging with steady-state free precession (PSIF) sequence at different delta values was evaluated qualitatively. A DW echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence and a DW single-shot turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence at different b values were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively using the apparent diffusion coefficient. Opposed-phase sequences were used to assess signal intensity qualitatively. The signal loss between in- and opposed-phase images was determined quantitatively. Two-tailed Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney test, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed. Sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were determined. RESULTS: Qualitative DW-PSIF imaging (delta = 3 ms) showed the best performance for distinguishing between benign and malignant fractures (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 88.5%; accuracy, 93.5%). Qualitative DW-EPI (b = 50 s/mm 2 [p = 1.00]; b = 250 s/mm 2 [p = 0.50]) and DW single-shot TSE imaging (b = 100 s/mm 2 [p = 1.00]; b = 250 s/mm 2 [p = 0.18]; b = 400 s/mm 2 [p = 0.18]; b = 600 s/mm 2 [p = 0.39]) did not indicate significant differences between benign and malignant fractures. DW-EPI using a b value of 500 s/mm 2 (p = 0.01) indicated significant differences between benign and malignant vertebral fractures. Quantitative DW-EPI (p = 0.09) and qualitative opposed-phase imaging (p = 0.06) did not exhibit significant differences, quantitative DW single-shot TSE imaging (p = 0.002) and quantitative chemical-shift imaging (p = 0.01) showed significant differences between benign and malignant fractures. CONCLUSION: The DW-PSIF sequence (delta = 3 ms) had the highest accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant vertebral fractures. Quantitative chemical-shift imaging and quantitative DW single-shot TSE imaging had a lower accuracy than DW-PSIF imaging because of a large overlap. Qualitative assessment of opposed-phase, DW-EPI, and DW singleshot TSE sequences and quantitative assessment of the DW-EPI sequence were not suitable for distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral fractures.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较定性弥散加权成像(DWI),定量DWI和化学位移成像在急性骨质疏松和恶性椎骨骨折患者的单个前瞻性队列中的诊断价值。受试者与方法:研究组由26例骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者组成(18名女性,八名男性;平均年龄69岁;年龄范围:31岁6个月至86岁2个月),以及20例恶性椎骨骨折(9名女性)。 ,男性11名;平均年龄63.4岁;年龄范围:24岁8个月至86岁4个月)。在1.5 T下获得T1加权,STIR和T2加权序列。定性评估了在不同增量值下具有稳态自由进动(PSIF)序列的DW反向快速成像。使用表观扩散系数定性和定量评估DW回波平面成像(EPI)序列和DW单发涡轮自旋回波(TSE)序列在不同b值的情况。相位相反的序列用于定性评估信号强度。定量确定了同相和反相图像之间的信号损耗。进行了两尾Fisher精确检验,Mann-Whitney检验和接收器工作特性分析。确定了敏感性,特异性和准确性。结果:定性DW-PSIF成像(增量= 3毫秒)显示出区分良性和恶性骨折的最佳性能(敏感性为100%;特异性为88.5%;准确性为93.5%)。定性DW-EPI(b = 50 s / mm 2 [p = 1.00]; b = 250 s / mm 2 [p = 0.50])和DW单次TSE成像(b = 100 s / mm 2 [p = 1.00] ]; b = 250 s / mm 2 [p = 0.18]; b = 400 s / mm 2 [p = 0.18]; b = 600 s / mm 2 [p = 0.39])没有表明良性和恶性之间的显着差异骨折。 DW-EPI使用b值为500 s / mm 2(p = 0.01)表示椎骨良性和恶性骨折之间存在显着差异。定量DW-EPI(p = 0.09)和定性反相成像(p = 0.06)没有显着差异,定量DW单次TSE成像(p = 0.002)和定量化学位移成像(p = 0.01)显示良性和恶性骨折之间的显着差异。结论:DW-PSIF序列(delta = 3 ms)在鉴别良性和恶性椎体骨折方面具有最高的准确性。定量化学位移成像和定量DW单次TSE成像比DW-PSIF成像精度低,因为有很大的重叠。对相,DW-EPI和DW单发TSE序列的定性评估以及DW-EPI序列的定量评估不适合区分椎骨良性和恶性骨折。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号