【24h】

Are Flexor Tendon Ruptures Ever Spontaneous? A Literature Review on Closed Flexor Tendon Ruptures of the Little Finger

机译:屈肌肌腱破裂是否自发? 关于小指的闭合屈曲肌腱破裂的文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: When closed ruptures of flexor tendons of fingers occur, there is often an identifiable pathology, which should be addressed in the same surgical setting as the tendon repair. The concept of "spontaneous" tendon rupture, occurring in the absence of identified pathology, however, has also been reported in a significant number of papers. This controversy has prompted us to do a review of the existing literature. Methods: We did a review of cases of closed ruptures of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) of the little finger in existing literature. Fifty-three publications were retrieved by searching "FDP tendon rupture" and "little finger" using PubMed database. We analyzed data such as the zone of rupture noted intra-operatively; and any precipitating factors, pathology or trauma. We also conducted a review on papers which discussed the concept of "spontaneous rupture". Results: Fifty-three publications were retrieved. There were 8 cases of ruptures in Zone I; 2 in Zone II; 30 in Zone III; 59 in Zone IV and 5 in Zone V. Majority of cases were associated with an element of trauma of varying severity, or pathology. A precipitating cause was not documented in 12 cases. Amongst all 36 cases of ruptures labelled as "spontaneous", only 1 case was truly "spontaneous" without any associated trauma or pathology. Conclusions: Most reports labeled as spontaneous rupture occurred in Zone III, where tendon ruptures are rare. There are documented pathological causes or evidence of trauma to most of these cases. We conclude these ruptures may have been mislabeled as spontaneous ruptures. Bearing in mind the propensity for tendon excursion, we suspect the lack of documentation of exploration in proximal zones contributed to this mislabeling. Understanding this concept of non-spontaneity to most tendon ruptures and the common sites of rupture or pathology is crucial for a surgeon to make strategic incisions and minimize future recurrence.
机译:背景:当发生手指的弯曲肌腱的闭合破裂时,通常存在可识别的病理学,这应该在与肌腱修复相同的外科设置中寻址。然而,在没有鉴定的病理学的情况下发生的“自发性”肌腱破裂的概念也在大量纸纸中报告。这种争议促使我们对现有文献进行审查。方法:我们对现有文献中的小指屈肌Digitorum Furofuncus(FDP)的闭裂性闭裂性案件进行了审查。通过使用PubMed数据库搜索“FDP肌腱破裂”和“小指”来检索五十三个出版物。我们分析了诸如可操作地注意到破裂区域的数据;和任何沉淀因素,病理学或创伤。我们还对论文进行了审查,讨论了“自发破裂”概念。结果:检索五十三个出版物。区内有8例破裂; 2区;第三区30; 59区IV区和5区5中的5.大多数病例与不同严重程度或病理学的创伤元素有关。在12例中没有记录沉淀的原因。在所有36例中,标记为“自发”的破裂情况,只有1例真正“自发”,没有任何相关的创伤或病理学。结论:大多数标记为自发性破裂的报告发生在区域III中,其中肌腱破裂是罕见的。对大多数情况下创伤的病理原因或证据有记录的病理原因或证据。我们得出结论,这些破裂可能被误标定为自发性破裂。考虑到肌腱游览的倾向,我们怀疑近端地区缺乏探索的文件,这是对这种误标表的贡献。了解这种非自发性的概念对大多数肌腱破裂和破裂或病理的常见网站对外科医生来说至关重要,以制定战略切口并尽量减少未来的复发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号