...
首页> 外文期刊>Weed Technology: A journal of the Weed Science Society of America >Cotton response to preplant applications of 2,4-D or dicamba
【24h】

Cotton response to preplant applications of 2,4-D or dicamba

机译:棉花反应2,4-D或Dicamba的假植物应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sensitive cotton varieties planted into soil treated with 2,4-D or dicamba utilized in burndowns can result in stunting and stand loss if use rate is too high and the plant-back interval is too short. The objective of this study was to evaluate cotton stunting and yield responses resulting from 2,4-D or dicamba residues in soil after preplant burndown applications at three locations in 2016 and 2017. Treatments with 2,4-D included 532 and 1,063 g ae ha(-1) applied 3 wk before planting (WBP) and 53, 160, 266, 532, 1,063 g ae ha(-1) applied at planting. Dicamba treatments included 560 and 1,120 g ae h(-1) applied 3 WBP and 56, 168, 280, 560, 1,120 g ae ha(-1) applied at planting. Dicamba or 2,4-D treatments applied 3 WBP resulted in no adverse effects on cotton stand, plant height, or yield. Dicamba 560 g ae h(-1) applied at planting reduced cotton stand by 36% at 21 to 24 d after planting (DAP) over all locations in 2016. In 2017, stands were reduced by dicamba at 168, 280, 560, and 1,120 g ae ha(-1) by 17% to 25% at 20 to 23 DAP. Moreover, cotton stands were not affected by 2,4-D in 2016, and only 266, 532, and 1,063 g ae ha(-1) of 2,4-D caused stand reductions of 26% to 36% at 20 to 23 DAP over all locations in 2017. Dicamba at 560 g ae ha(-1) at planting was the only treatment in this study that reduced plant height. Although stand losses were observed in both years, no yield loss occurred. The data suggest that stunting and stand reduction may occur if susceptible varieties are planted soon after burndown applications with 2,4-D or dicamba, but yield may not be affected after a full growing season. Dicamba showed greater potential to cause stunting and stand reduction than 2,4-D.
机译:种植成用2,4-D或在烧伤中使用的土壤种植成土壤的敏感棉品种可能导致使用速率过高,植物背间隔太短时损失。本研究的目的是评估棉花稳定和产量反应,其在2016年和2017年的三个地区的血型烧伤应用后的土壤中的2,4-D或Dicamba残基导致。含有2,4-D的处理包括532和1,063g Ae HA(-1)在种植(WBP)和53,160,266,532,160,160,266,532,1063g Ae(-1)之前施用3WK。 Dicamba治疗包括560和1,120g Ae H(-1)施加3 WBP和56,168,280,560,120g AE HA(-1),施用在种植。 Dicamba或2,4-D治疗施用3 WBP导致对棉架,植物高度或产量没有不利影响。 Dicamba 560 G AE H(-1)在2016年在所有地点种植(DAP)后在种植植物的施用后21至24天施用36%。2017年,Dicamba在168,280,560和1,120g ae ha(-1)在20至23个dap时达17%至25%。此外,2016年棉花架不受2,4-D的影响,仅266,532和1,063g AE HA(-1)的2,4-D导致26%〜23的支架降低为26%至36%在2017年的所有地点上系。560克AE HA(-1)的Dicamba在植物中是唯一降低植物高度的研究中的唯一治疗方法。虽然在两年内观察到实体损失,但没有发生屈服损失。数据表明,如果在用2,4-D或Dicamba烧毁应用后很快种植了易感品种,则可能发生静置和降低,但在满足季节后,产量可能不会受到影响。 Dicamba显示出更大的潜力,导致静置和降低超过2,4-d。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号