...
首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study.
【24h】

Occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study.

机译:急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗后无效再通的发生率和预测因素:一项多中心研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although recanalization is the goal of thrombolysis, it is well recognized that it fails to improve outcome of acute stroke in a subset of patients. Our aim was to assess the rate of and factors associated with futile recanalization, recanalization, following endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 6 studies of acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical and/or pharmacologic endovascular treatment were analyzed. "Futile recanalization" was defined by the occurrence of unfavorable outcome (mRS score of > or = 3 at 1-3 months) despite complete angiographic recanalization (Qureshi grade 0 or TIMI grade 3). RESULTS: Complete recanalization was observed in 96 of 270 patients treated with IA thrombolysis. Futile recanalization was observed in 47 (49%). In univariate analysis, patients with futile recanalization were older (73 +/- 11 versus 58 +/- 15 years, P < .0001) and had higher median initial NIHSS scores (19 versus 14, P < .0001), more frequent BA occlusion (17% versus 4%, P = .049), less frequent MCA occlusion (53% versus 76%, P = .032), and a nonsignificantly higher rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic complications (2% versus 9%, P = .2). In logistic regression analysis, futile recanalization was positively associated with age > 70 years (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9-10.5; P = .0008) and initial NIHSS score 10-19 (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.4; P = .001), and initial NIHSS score > or = 20 (OR, 64.4; 95% CI, 28.8-144; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Futile recanalization is a relatively common occurrence following endovascular treatment, particularly among elderly patients and those with severe neurologic deficits.
机译:背景与目的:尽管再通是溶栓的目标,但众所周知,它不能改善部分患者急性中风的预后。我们的目的是评估急性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗后无效的再通,再通的发生率和相关因素。材料与方法:分析了6项机械性和/或药物性血管内治疗对急性缺血性卒中的研究数据。尽管完全进行了血管造影再通(Qureshi 0级或TIMI 3级),但发生不良预后(mRS评分在1-3个月时≥3)定义为“无功再通”。结果:在IA溶栓治疗的270例患者中有96例完全再通。 47例(49%)观察到无效的再通。在单因素分析中,无效再通的患者年龄较大(73 +/- 11 vs 58 +/- 15岁,P <.0001),并且初始NIHSS得分中位数较高(19 vs 14,P <.0001),BA更为频繁闭塞(17%对4%,P = .049),MCA闭塞的发生率较低(53%对76%,P = .032),症状性出血并发症的发生率没有明显增加(2%对9%,P =。 2)。在逻辑回归分析中,无效的再通与年龄大于70岁(OR,4.4; 95%CI,1.9-10.5; P = .0008)和初始NIHSS评分10-19(OR,3.8; 95%CI,1.7)呈正相关-8.4; P = .001),且初始NIHSS得分>或= 20(OR,64.4; 95%CI,28.8-144; P <.0001)。结论:无效的再通是血管内治疗后相对普遍的现象,特别是在老年患者和严重神经功能缺损患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号