首页> 外文期刊>Wildlife Society Bulletin >Limiting Conflicts When Managing Public Lands for Furbearer Trapping and Dog-Related Recreation
【24h】

Limiting Conflicts When Managing Public Lands for Furbearer Trapping and Dog-Related Recreation

机译:在管理公共土地时限制冲突,用于突厥者陷阱和狗相关的娱乐

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Resource users with different interests frequent public lands, resulting in opportunity for conflict. We examined the issue of interactions among wildlife trappers and dog owners by examining stakeholders' socio-demographics, land usage, concerns, attitudes, and satisfaction with multiuse public land management for recreation with dogs and furbearer trapping. We sent mail-back questionnaires to licensed dog owners (n = 1,000; hereafter, dog owners) and licensed wildlife trappers (n = 1,000; hereafter, wildlife trappers) in a 10-county area of New York, USA, during 2009. After weighting data, results revealed dog owners and wildlife trappers had differences in land usage patterns for all land types. Dog owners and wildlife trappers, regardless of whether they owned a dog, differed in all items except that they had similar levels of satisfaction for management of public lands in their region for both recreation with dogs and wildlife trapping. Seeing dogs under voice and sight command of their owneror trainer was positively related to satisfaction with management of public lands for wildlife trappers and agreement that dog owners have few places to take their dogs and allow them to run off-leash. Concern about dogs getting caught in wildlife trapswas negatively related to satisfaction with public lands management for wildlife trappers. For dog owners, agreement that trappers should be allowed to trap on public lands was positively related to satisfaction. Our results suggest that state wildlife agencies seeking to improve stakeholder interactions and satisfaction with public land management for both wildlife trapping and recreation with dogs should promote the importance of dogs being under control through voice or sight command or directly on aleash, and should consider creating spaces for dogs to run off leash.
机译:资源用户具有不同兴趣的频繁公共土地,导致冲突机会。我们通过审查利益相关者的社会人口统计学,土地使用,担忧,态度以及与狗的休闲和捕获者诱捕来审查利益相关者的社会人口统计学,土地使用,担忧,态度以及满意度来研究野生动物捕手和狗主人的互动问题。我们将邮寄调查问卷发送给许可的狗主人(n = 1,000;以下,野生动物捕手(n = 1,000;以下)在美国的10县地区,2009年。之后加权数据,结果显示的狗主人和野生动物捕手在所有土地类型的土地使用模式下有差异。无论他们是否拥有一只狗,狗所有者和野生动物捕手都在所有物品中都有不同的不同之处,除了他们在与狗和野生动物诱捕的地区的地区的公共土地管理类似的满意度。在主流培训师的声音和视线指挥下看到狗与野生动物捕手的公共土地管理呈积极关系,狗主人只有很少的地方拿走他们的狗并让他们逃过皮带。担心狗陷入野生动物陷阱与对野生动物捕手的公共土地管理的满意度负相关。对于狗主人来说,允许捕手的协议应该陷入公共土地上的陷阱与满意度正相关。我们的结果表明,寻求改善利益相关方互动和与狗的公共土地管理的国家野生动物代理商应该通过语音或视线指挥或直接在亚非船上促进狗被控制的重要性,并考虑创造空间为狗逃跑皮带。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号