首页> 外文期刊>Wildlife Society Bulletin >Are Composition Surveys for Mule Deer Along Roads or From Helicopters Biased? Lessons from the Field
【24h】

Are Composition Surveys for Mule Deer Along Roads or From Helicopters Biased? Lessons from the Field

机译:沿着道路或直升机偏见的直升机是骡鹿的组成调查吗? 来自该领域的课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Monitoring sex and age ratios (i.e., population composition) is common practice in deer (Odocoileus spp.) management because these estimates are used to determine population vital rates, as well as assess effects of hunting regulations and other management actions. However, there is longstanding recognition of potential biases in sex and age ratios that can arise from differences in deer behavior and sightability, or from methodological issues, such as using roads for sampling. Biologists often use roads for composition surveys because of convenience and roads are often considered to provide coverage of the sampling area and, consequently, unbiased estimates of sex and age ratios. We tested the long‐standing belief that low‐use roads through muledeer (O. hemionus) winter range provided an unbiased sampling scheme by designing and conducting a random‐route survey in conjunction with the road survey through the same winter range in Round Valley, California, USA, during 2015 and 2016. In addition,we conducted a helicopter survey of the same area in 2016. We found adult male:adult female (buck:doe) ratios were 31–45% greater from the random‐route survey compared with the road survey. There was no difference in buck:doe ratios between road and helicopter surveys, but the random‐route survey had 55% greater buck:doe ratios than the helicopter survey. The helicopter survey also had 2.2–4.7 times greater proportions of unclassified bucks than the road or random‐route surveys. There were no differences in fawn:doe ratios among the 3 survey methods. We conducted additional spatial analyses to determine if the buck:doe ratio was greater along random‐routes because bucks were avoiding roads or because the random‐route survey covered different areas. We found that bucks were not avoiding roads; rather, the roads did not adequately cover the winter range area. There were differences between all 3 methods, but our main message is that the assumption that roads provide adequate coverage of winter range and unbiased estimates of population composition should be evaluated. To evaluate that assumption, we recommend conducting ≥1 survey using random routes and comparing composition estimates with road surveys. Further, if information on buck antler‐class is required for management decisions, a ground survey is preferable to a helicopter survey.
机译:监测性和年龄比率(即人口组成)是鹿(Odocoileus SPP)的常见做法,因为这些估计用于确定人口重要率,以及评估狩猎法规和其他管理行动的影响。然而,长期以来识别性和年龄比率中的潜在偏见,这可能来自鹿行为和可视性的差异,或者从方法论问题中,例如使用道路进行抽样。生物学家通常使用道路用于组合调查,因为便利性和道路通常被认为提供了采样区域的覆盖范围,因此,性别和年龄比率的无偏见估计。我们测试了长期以来的信念,即通过Muledeer(O. Hemionus)冬季范围提供了一种无偏的抽样方案,通过设计和开展通过圆谷的同一冬季范围的道路调查进行随机路线调查,提供了一种无偏的抽样方案。加利福尼亚州,美国,2015年和2016年。此外,我们在2016年对同一地区进行了直升机调查。我们发现成年男性:成年女性(BUCK:DOE)比率从随机路线调查比较了31-45%随着道路调查。降压没有差异:道路和直升机调查之间的母鹿比率,但随机路线调查有55%更高的降压:母鹿比直升机调查。直升机调查也比道路或随机路线调查更大的未分类雄鹿比例更大的2.2-4.7倍。小鹿没有差异:3种调查方法中的母鹿比率。我们进行了额外的空间分析,以确定降压是否沿随机路线更大,因为雄鹿正在避免道路或因为随机路线调查涵盖了不同的区域。我们发现雄鹿不避免道路;相反,道路没有充分覆盖冬季范围区域。所有3种方法之间存在差异,但我们的主要信息是,应该评估道路提供足够覆盖的冬季范围和无偏见的人口组成估算的假设。为了评估该假设,我们建议使用随机路线进行≥1调查,并使用道路调查比较组成估计。此外,如果有关管理决策所需的关于降压鹿角阶级的信息,则优于直升机调查的地面调查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wildlife Society Bulletin》 |2020年第1期|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Utah State University Department of Wildland Resources 5320 Old Main Hill Logan UT 84322 USA;

    California Department of Fish and Wildlife 787 N Main Street Suite 220 Bishop CA 93514 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 动物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号