首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of prosthodontics >Comparison Between Altered Cast Impression and Conventional Single-Impression Techniques for Distal Extension Removable Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Comparison Between Altered Cast Impression and Conventional Single-Impression Techniques for Distal Extension Removable Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review

机译:改变铸造印模与传统单印模技术的比较远端延伸可拆卸牙科假肢:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To systematically review the available literature and determine the potential benefits of altered cast impression technique over conventional single-impression techniques for the fabrication of distal extension removable dental prostheses. Materials and Methods: The indexed English literature published up to April 30, 2018, was systematically searched for studies comparing altered cast impression technique to conventional single-impression techniques for the fabrication of distal extension removable dental prostheses using guidelines recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA). The databases searched were PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE (OVID). Two reviewers independently screened and shortlisted the relevant studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Seven studies were included in this review; all were in vivo studies. All seven studies reported that cast removable partial dentures fabricated with altered cast impression technique displayed less vertical movement of denture bases compared to those fabricated using conventional impression techniques. Two of these studies reported that this difference in vertical movement was clinically insignificant, while the other five studies reported a statistically significant difference in vertical movement but were uncertain regarding clinical significance. Conclusion: The results of this literature review indicate that the altered cast impression technique did not offer significant advantages over conventional single-impression techniques. The lack of convincing data to predict superiority of the altered cast impression technique for distal extension removable dental prosthesis impressions emphasizes the need for more scientific research with larger sample sizes and longer performance reviews of removable dental prostheses.
机译:目的:为了系统地审查可用的文献,并确定改变铸造印模技术的潜在益处,用于制造远端延伸牙科假体的传统单印模技术。材料和方法:在2018年4月30日公布的索引英语文学中,系统地搜索了使用优先报告项目建议的常规单印模技术对传统的单印模技术进行比较的研究,以使用优选的报告项目的系统化评论和元分析(Prisma)。搜索的数据库是Pubmed,Cochrane库和Medline(Ovid)。两位审稿人根据预定义的包含和排除标准独立筛选和遗行相关研究。结果:七项研究纳入了本综述;一切都在体内研究。所有七项研究报告说,与使用常规印模技术制造的那些相比,用改变的铸造印模技术制造的铸造可拆卸的部分义齿显示出义齿底座的垂直运动。这些研究中的两个报道说,这种垂直运动的差异是临床上微不足道的,而另外五项研究报告垂直运动统计学差异,但对临床意义不确定。结论:该文献综述结果表明,改变的铸造印模技术与传统的单印模技术没有具有显着的优势。缺乏令人信服的数据来预测远端延伸可拆卸牙科假体假体的改变的铸造印模技术的优越性强调需要更具科学研究,更大的样本尺寸和更长的可移除牙科假肢的性能点评。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号