首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry >Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Gingival Unit Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Gingival Unit Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:自由牙龈移植物和牙龈单位移植物的比较治疗牙龈衰退:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the use of gingival unit graft (GUG) with free gingival graft (FGG) for treating wide gingival recession and increasing keratinized tissue. This randomized controlled trial with a split-mouth design included 30 localized bilateral recessions (Miller Classes I and II) that were randomly treated with GUG or FGG. Both grafts were fixed by cyanoacrylate glue. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, vertical recession depth, and keratinized tissue width were recorded at baseline and 1 and 6 months after surgery. The postoperative mean percentage of root coverage at 1 and 6 months was better on GUG side, and KTW significantly increased on the same side 1 month after surgery (P < .05). GUG might be an acceptable modality for increasing keratinized tissue and treating recession.
机译:本研究的目的是将牙龈单元移植(GUG)与游离牙龈移植物(FGG)的使用进行比较,用于治疗宽牙龈衰退和增加角质化组织。 这种随机对照试验的分裂口设计包括30个局部双边衰退(米勒类I和II),这些衰退(米勒类I和II)随着GUG或FGG随机处理。 通过氰基丙烯酸酯胶水固定两种移植物。 探测深度,临床附着水平,垂直衰退深度和角膜化组织宽度在术后1和6个月内记录。 在1和6个月的术后平均百分比在古格侧更好,手术后1个月在同一侧的同一侧显着增加(P <.05)。 GUG可能是增加角化组织和治疗经济衰退的可接受的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号