【24h】

Comparison of the accuracy rates of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI of the knee in the diagnosis of meniscal tear.

机译:膝关节3-T和1.5-T MRI在半月板撕裂诊断中的准确率比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of 3-T MRI with that of 1.5-T MRI of the knee in the diagnosis of meniscal tear and to analyze the causes of diagnostic error. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and original MRI interpretations of 100 consecutive patients who underwent 3-T MRI of the knee and of 100 consecutive patients who underwent 1.5-T MRI of the knee to determine the accuracy of diagnoses of meniscal tear. Knee arthroscopy was the reference standard. We retrospectively reviewed all MRI diagnostic errors to determine the cause of the errors. RESULTS: At arthroscopy, 109 medial and 77 lateral meniscal tears were identified in the 200 patients. With two abnormal MR images indicating a meniscal tear, the sensitivity and specificity for medial tear were 92.7% and 82.2% at 1.5-T MRI and 92.6% and 76.1% at 3-T MRI (p = 1.0, p = 0.61). The sensitivity and specificity for lateral tears were 68.4% and 95.2% at 1.5-T MRI and 69.2% and 91.8% at 3-T MRI (p = 1.0, p = 0.49). Of the false-positive diagnoses of medial meniscal tear, five of eight at 1.5 T and seven of 11 at 3 T were apparent peripheral longitudinal tears of the posterior horn. Fifteen of the 26 missed medial and lateral meniscal tears were not seen in retrospect even with knowledge of the tear type and location. CONCLUSION: Allowing for sample size limitations, we found comparable accuracy of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI of the knee in the diagnosis of meniscal tear. The causes of false-positive and false-negative MRI diagnoses of meniscal tear are similar for 3-T and 1.5-T MRI.
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较3-T MRI和1.5-T MRI在诊断半月板撕裂中的准确性,并分析诊断错误的原因。材料与方法:我们回顾了100例接受了膝部3T MRI检查的连续患者和100例接受了膝部1.5T MRI检查的连续患者的病历和MRI原始诊断,以确定半月板撕裂的诊断准确性。膝关节镜检查是参考标准。我们回顾性检查了所有MRI诊断错误,以确定错误的原因。结果:在关节镜检查中,在200例患者中鉴定出109例内侧半月板撕裂和77例外侧半月板撕裂。在两个异常的MR图像显示半月板撕裂的情况下,对内侧撕裂的敏感性和特异性在1.5-T MRI时分别为92.7%和82.2%,在3-T MRI中分别为92.6%和76.1%(p = 1.0,p = 0.61)。在1.5-T MRI上对侧部撕裂的敏感性和特异性分别为68.4%和95.2%,在3T MRI上分别为69.2%和91.8%(p = 1.0,p = 0.49)。在半月板内侧撕裂的假阳性诊断中,1.5 T时八分之五和3 T时十一分之七是后角明显的周围纵向撕裂。即使回顾了泪液的类型和位置,在回顾中也没有发现26例中,外侧半月板漏诊中的15例。结论:考虑到样本量的限制,我们发现膝部3-T和1.5-T MRI在半月板撕裂的诊断中具有可比的准确性。 3-T和1.5-T MRI对半月板撕裂的MRI假阳性和假阴性的诊断原因相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号