首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Ultrasound-based diagnostic classification for solid and partially cystic thyroid nodules
【24h】

Ultrasound-based diagnostic classification for solid and partially cystic thyroid nodules

机译:基于超声的甲状腺实性和部分囊性结节的诊断分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ability of US to differentiate benign thyroid nodules from malignant ones is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of a US-based classification system for solid and PCTNs through a prospectively designed study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 1289 thyroid nodules in 1036 patients who underwent thyroid US, US-FNA, and thyroid surgery. Each thyroid nodule was prospectively classified into 1 of 5 diagnostic categories following real-time US examination: benign, probably benign, borderline, possibly malignant, and malignant. Solid nodules were classified by using all 5 categories, and PCTNs were classified by all except the borderline category. We calculated the diagnostic efficacy of thyroid US by comparing US diagnoses with histopathologic results of surgically resected thyroid nodules. RESULTS: One thousand fifty-five solid nodules and 234 PCTNs were prospectively classified as benign (n = 435 and 179), probably benign (n = 213 and 25), borderline (n = 94 and 0), possibly malignant (n = 115 and 15), and malignant (n = 198 and 15), respectively. Of these 1289 nodules, 505 were surgically resected and confirmed by pathology (191 benign and 314 malignant nodules); there were 44 resected solid nodules with a borderline category. For solid nodules and PCTNs, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of US diagnosis were 86.1 and 66.7, 90.0 and 88.9, 94.3 and 75.0, 77.3 and 84.2, and 87.5% and 81.5%, respectively, based on 505 surgical specimens and excluding the 42 solid borderline nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Our US-based classification system can provide helpful guidance for the management of thyroid nodules.
机译:背景与目的:美国区分甲状腺良性结节与恶性结节的能力仍是一个有争议的问题。这项研究的目的是通过一项前瞻性研究来评估基于美国的固体和PCTN分类系统的诊断效力。材料与方法:我们研究了1036例行甲状腺US,US-FNA和甲状腺手术的患者中的1289个甲状腺结节。在实时US检查后,将每个甲状腺结节前瞻性地分为5个诊断类别中的1个:良性,可能良性,临界状态,可能是恶性和恶性。使用所有5个类别对实体瘤进行分类,除边界线类别以外,对PCTN进行分类。我们通过将US诊断与手术切除的甲状腺结节的组织病理学结果进行比较,计算了甲状腺US的诊断功效。结果:预期将155个实性结节和234个PCTN分为良性(n = 435和179),可能是良性(n = 213和25),边界(n = 94和0),可能是恶性(n = 115和15)和恶性(n = 198和15)。在这1289个结节中,有505个经手术切除并经病理证实(191个良性结节和314个恶性结节)。有44个切除的实性结节具有边界线类别。对于实体结节和PCTN,根据诊断,US诊断的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值和准确度分别为86.1和66.7、90.0和88.9、94.3和75.0、77.3和84.2和87.5%和81.5%。 505个手术标本,但不包括42个实生的交界性结节。结论:我们基于美国的分类系统可以为甲状腺结节的治疗提供有用的指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号