首页> 外文期刊>Tropical Animal Health and Production >Do vaccination interventions have effects? A study on how poultry vaccination interventions change smallholder farmer knowledge, attitudes, and practice in villages in Kenya and Tanzania
【24h】

Do vaccination interventions have effects? A study on how poultry vaccination interventions change smallholder farmer knowledge, attitudes, and practice in villages in Kenya and Tanzania

机译:疫苗接种干预措施是否有影响? 禽类疫苗接种干预如何改变肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚村庄的小农农民知识,态度和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Poultry are important for many poor households in developing countries, but there are many constraints to poultry production, including disease. One of the most important diseases of chickens is Newcastle disease (ND). Even though there are effective vaccines against this disease available in most countries, uptake by small-scale poultry keepers is often low. In this study, two areas in Kenya and Tanzania were studied, where some villages had received additional support to get vaccination and other villages had not. In Kenya, 320 households from 10 villages were interviewed, of which half of the villages had active promotion of vaccination through village-based advisors. In Tanzania, 457 households were interviewed, of which 241 came from villages that have had active support through either a project or government extension services. Knowledge about vaccines and the attitudes towards vaccinating against ND was evaluated using mixed multivariable logistic models. Results indicate that in Kenya, the most important determinants for understanding the function of a vaccine were having had support in the village and to have knowledge about ND signs, while in Tanzania gender and previous vaccine use were important in addition to having had support. Attitudes towards vaccination were mainly determined by knowledge, where more knowledge about how vaccines work in general or about ND contributed to more positive attitudes. Among Kenyan farmers that had never used the vaccine before, the amount of birds they lost to disease and predators also influenced attitudes. In conclusion, this study supports the notion that knowledge is a very important component of extension support and that simply making vaccines available may not be sufficient for high levels of uptake.
机译:家禽对发展中国家的许多贫困家庭都很重要,但禽类生产有许多限制,包括疾病。鸡的最重要的疾病之一是纽卡斯尔疾病(ND)。尽管在大多数国家的这种疾病中存在有效的疫苗,但小型家禽饲养员的吸收往往往往很低。在这项研究中,研究了肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚的两个地区,其中一些村庄已收到额外的支持,以获得疫苗接种,其他村庄没有。在肯尼亚,来自10个村庄的320户受访,其中一半的村庄通过基于村庄的顾问积极推广疫苗接种。在坦桑尼亚,采访了457名户,其中241家来自通过项目或政府推广服务积极支持的村庄。使用混合多变量逻辑模型评估了关于疫苗和对ND接种疫苗的态度的知识。结果表明,在肯尼亚,理解疫苗功能的最重要的决定因素在村庄都有支持,并在坦桑尼亚性别和以前的疫苗使用中具有重要性,除了支持的情况下,对于坦桑尼亚性别和之前的疫苗使用是重要的。疫苗接种的态度主要由知识决定,更有了解疫苗如何工作或关于ND如何促进更积极的态度。在肯尼亚农民中从未使用过疫苗,他们对疾病和捕食者失去的鸟类的量也影响了态度。总之,本研究支持知识是延期支持的一个非常重要的组成部分,并且只需制造可用的疫苗可能不足以获得高水平的摄取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号