首页> 外文期刊>Transport Reviews >Parking management for promoting sustainable transport in urban neighbourhoods. A review of existing policies and challenges from a German perspective
【24h】

Parking management for promoting sustainable transport in urban neighbourhoods. A review of existing policies and challenges from a German perspective

机译:促进城市社区可持续交通的停车管理。 从德国视角审查现有政策和挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The organisation of parking is a key challenge to more sustainable mobility in urban areas, as its pricing and availability affect the rates of private car ownership and use. However, changing parking policies is a challenging issue for local politicians and planners because residents frequently oppose changes or restrictions to conditions they have taken for granted such as on-street parking in a public space. The aim of this paper is firstly to assess how the parking policy of an urban neighbourhood can be structured to contribute to more sustainable mobility and to increase liveability in the neighbourhood. The second aim is to apply the policies reviewed to an example neighbourhood. For this purpose, we systematically reviewed academic literature and identified five types of relevant parking policies: (i) maximum parking requirements, (ii) physical detachment of residence and parking space, (iii) residential parking permits and the limitation of available parking space, (iv) performance-based pricing and (v) parking as a demand management strategy. We discovered that most research focuses on econometric models about parking and that studies rarely address the effects of parking on the quality of life in neighbourhoods. Therefore, we need further research regarding the relationship of parking and liveability. We conclude that for the implementation of such parking policies in an example neighbourhood, the municipality needs to develop a mobility vision for its city. It has to understand parking as a tool for transportation demand management to increase the acceptance of parking policy concepts and to avoid spillover problems. Finally, in the German case, as in most other countries, states and municipalities need to redesign their legal frameworks to be able to manage parking supply better and to react to changes related to digital developments and parking. The findings have implications for other European neighbourhoods regarding the transfer from research to local circumstances and applications for the whole city.
机译:停车组织是城市地区更可持续移动性的关键挑战,因为其定价和可用性影响私人汽车所有权和使用率。然而,不断变化的停车政策对于当地政治家和规划者来说是一个有挑战性的问题,因为居民经常反对他们在公共空间中被批准的条件的变化或限制。本文的目的首先评估城市邻居的停车政策如何构建,以促进更可持续的流动性,并增加邻居的达费率。第二个目的是将审查的政策应用于示例社区。为此目的,我们系统地审查了学术文献,并确定了五种类型的相关停车策略:(i)最大停车要求,(ii)居住地和停车位的物理脱离,(iii)住宅停车许可证和可用停车位的限制, (iv)基于绩效的定价和(v)停车作为需求管理策略。我们发现大多数研究侧重于关于停车的经济学模式,并且该研究很少解决停车位于社区生活质量的影响。因此,我们需要进一步研究停车和逗留性的关系。我们得出结论,为了实施其他街区的停车政策,市政当局需要为其城市制定流动性愿景。它必须了解停车作为运输需求管理的工具,以增加停车政策概念的接受,并避免溢出问题。最后,在德国案中,与大多数其他国家一样,各国和市政当局需要重新设计其法律框架,以便能够更好地管理停车服务,并对与数字发展和停车有关的变化作出反应。该调查结果对其他欧洲社区有关从研究转移到整个城市的申请的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号