...
首页> 外文期刊>Tribology letters >Study of Surface Roughness on Friction in Rolling/Sliding Contacts: Ball-on-Disc Versus Twin-Disc
【24h】

Study of Surface Roughness on Friction in Rolling/Sliding Contacts: Ball-on-Disc Versus Twin-Disc

机译:轧制/滑动触点摩擦表面粗糙度的研究:球盘与双盘

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although the efficiency of a gear pair is currently high, a better understanding of surface/lubricant contribution on efficiency is critical. Electrified drivelines will, for example, impose higher speed and alternate loading, and it is expected that these new conditions will, to a greater extent, rely on the surface/lubricant characteristics. Phenomena taking place in the gear contact is often measured using ball-on-disc and twin-disc tribometers. In this study, these two test set-ups were compared in order to assess differences in the behaviour of surface/lubricant interactions. Results showed that ball-on-disc and twin-disc set-ups reflect the same friction trends. However, the friction results differed by a factor of roughly two, even though the tribometers were set-up to run at the same contact pressure. The wear mechanisms also differed: micropits occurred on discs used in the twin-disc set-up, whereas normal or no wear was found on the ball-on-disc specimens. The contact conditions for the two test set-ups were also analysed using a numerical model. The comparison of these two machines may aid gear designers in selecting the proper experimental set-up for their purpose.
机译:虽然齿轮对的效率目前很高,但更好地了解表面/润滑剂对效率的贡献至关重要。例如,电气化的驱动器例如强加更高的速度和交替的负载,并且预计这些新条件将在更大程度上依赖于表面/润滑剂特性。在齿轮接触中进行的现象通常使用球盘和双盘曲线计测量。在这项研究中,比较这两个测试设置,以评估表面/润滑剂相互作用的行为的差异。结果表明,圆盘和双盘式设置反映了相同的摩擦趋势。然而,即使在相同的接触压力下设定曲线计,摩擦结果也大约两倍。磨损机制也有所不同:在双盘设置中使用的圆盘上发生微型,而在球盘样本上发现正常或没有磨损。还使用数值模型分析了两个测试组的接触条件。这两台机器的比较可以帮助齿轮设计师选择适当的实验设置以其目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号