首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France
【24h】

Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France

机译:对法国汽车对骑车者事故中的自主应急制动效能的前瞻性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems in car-to-cyclist frontal collisions by simulating their effects, in terms of crash avoidance and injury mitigation, on a representative target population of real-world accidents. Identifying effectiveness-critical AEB-cyclist design parameters through a sensitivity analysis was also targeted. Methods: The analysis is based on a representative set of real-world car-to-cyclist frontal collisions gathered from French police reports. AEB-cyclist-relevant accident cases were first selected and used to build injury risk curves for fatal, severe, and slight cyclist injuries. The effect of AEB-cyclist on these cases was then simulated by means of a car kinematic model involving sensor detection strategies and actuator actions. Combining the resulting simulated impact speed distributions with the injury risk curves allowed to assess AEB-cyclist's effectiveness in terms of lives saved and mitigated injuries. Using design of experiments methods, the sensitivity of this effectiveness with regards to AEB-cyclist design parameters could be assessed. Results: Cyclist injury risks curves were built, along with their confidence intervals, for fatal, severe, and slight injuries using a polytomous complementary log-log regression model, with squared impact speed as an independent variable. A sensitivity analysis on an ideal bisensor AEB-cyclist setting highlighted influential design parameters such as maximal braking intensity or crucial decision algorithm parameters such as maximal time and distance to collision thresholds. AEB-cyclist effectiveness was nevertheless shown to range from 35% to 59% in fatalities, 14% to 54% in severe injuries, and 11% to 42% in slight injuries, depending on field of view parameters alone, once reference values of decision algorithm parameters had been set. Conclusions: This study illustrates the potential benefits and limits of AEB-cyclist systems. High-end systems show acceptable effectiveness rates, but road safety performance strongly depends on external factors such as road surface conditions or has to be tuned in order to avoid unnecessary activations and driver discomfort. Limits of the system's everyday use (lack of maintenance, driver reaction time to collision warnings, etc.) were not taken into account, thus resulting in optimistic evaluations of AEB-cyclist effectiveness.
机译:目的:本研究旨在通过模拟现实世界意外的代表性目标群体来评估自主应急制动(AEB)系统在汽车对骑车者前碰撞中的效果。通过敏感性分析识别有效性 - 关键AEB - 骑车者设计参数也是针对性的。方法:分析基于由法国警察报告收集的代表性的现实世界汽车到骑车人的正面碰撞。首先选择AEB-骑自行车者相关的事故案例并用于构建致命,严重和轻微骑自行车者伤害的伤害风险曲线。然后通过涉及传感器检测策略和执行器动作的汽车运动学模型来模拟AEB骑自行车者对这些情况的影响。结合所产生的模拟冲击速度分布与损伤风险曲线允许评估Aeb-骑车者在挽救和减轻伤害的终身方面的有效性。使用实验方法的设计,可以评估该有效性对AEB骑车者设计参数的敏感性。结果:骑自行车的伤害风险曲线是建造的,以及他们的置信区间,用于使用多元素互补的记录回归模型的致命,严重和轻微伤害,具有平方冲击速度作为独立变量。理想的小体AEB - 骑自行车者设置突出显示的影响设计参数,例如最大制动强度或关键决策算法参数,如最大时间和距离碰撞阈值。然而,AEB-Cyclist效果仍然显示在死亡的35%至59%的范围内,严重损伤的14%至54%,略有伤害的11%〜42%,这取决于观察参数,一旦参考决策的参考价值已经设置了算法参数。结论:本研究说明了AEB - 骑自行车者系统的潜在益处和限制。高端系统显示可接受的有效性率,但道路安全性能强烈取决于外部因素,如道路表面状况,或者必须调整,以避免不必要的激活和驾驶员不适。没有考虑系统日常使用的限制(缺乏维护,驾驶员反应时间,碰撞警告等),从而导致Aeb-骑车者效果的乐观评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号