首页> 外文期刊>The patient >Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research
【24h】

Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research

机译:基于体验的价值观:分类不同类型的健康估值研究经验的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Whether health values should be elicited from the perspective of patients or the general public is still an open debate. The overall aim of this paper is to increase knowledge on the role of experience in health preference-based valuation research. The objectives of this paper are threefold. First, we elaborate the idea of experience-based (EB) values under the informed value or knowledge viewpoint. We think the whole scope of knowledge about the health states involved in valuation exercises is not fully integrated in the previous literature. For instance, personal knowledge based on past experiences, contemplating the health state as a likely future condition, knowing someone who is currently experiencing the state, or just receiving detailed information about the health states; all these situations capture different nuances of health-related experience which are not explicitly referred to in valuation tasks. Second, we propose a framework where the extended factor of experience is detached from other factors interwoven into the valuation exercise. Third, we examine how experience is tackled in different value sets (EB or non-EB) identified via a literature review. We identified the following elements (and items) in a value set: health state (without description, described using a multi-attribute instrument, described using other method), reference person (the respondent; other person, similar/known/hypothetical), time frame (past, present, future), raters (public, representative/convenience; vested interest, patients/other) and experience (personal experience, past/present/future; vicarious experience, affective/non-affective; no experience). Forty-nine valuation exercises were extracted from 22 reviewed papers and classified following our suggested set of elements and items. The results show that the role of experience reported in health valuation-related papers is frequently disregarded or, at most, minimised to the item of personal experience (present)-linked to self-reported health.
机译:是否应该从患者的角度出发,或者公众仍然是一个公开辩论。本文的整体目标是提高基于健康偏好的估值研究的经验的作用。本文的目标是三倍。首先,我们在知情价值或知识观点下阐述了基于经验的(EB)值的想法。我们认为,关于估值练习中涉及的健康国家的全部知识尚未完全集成在以前的文献中。例如,基于过去经验的个人知识,将健康状况视为可能的未来条件,了解目前正在经历该州的人,或者只是收到有关健康国家的详细信息;所有这些情况都捕获了与估值任务中没有明确提及的健康有关经验的不同细微差别。其次,我们提出了一个框架,其中扩展的经验因素与交织在估值运动中的其他因素中脱离。第三,我们研究通过文献综述所识别的不同价值集(EB或非EB)的经验如何。我们在值集中识别以下元素(和项目):健康状态(没有使用多属性仪器描述使用其他方法描述),参考人(被访者;其他人,类似/已知/假设),时间框架(过去,礼物,未来),评估者(公共,代表性/便利;既得利益,患者/其他)和经验(个人经验,过去/现在/未来;替代经验,情感/不情感;没有经验)。从22个审查的论文中提取了四十九项估值练习,并在我们建议的元素和物品组中进行分类。结果表明,在健康估值相关论文中报告的经验的作用经常被忽视或最多,最小化到个人经验(目前)的项目 - 链接到自我报告的健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号