...
首页> 外文期刊>The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society >Surgical versus nonsurgical management for type II odontoid fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review
【24h】

Surgical versus nonsurgical management for type II odontoid fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review

机译:老年人人口中II型Odontoid骨折的手术与非牙科管理:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BackgroundOdontoid process fractures, of which type II constitute the majority, are an increasingly important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. The incidence of geriatric type II fractures is steadily increasing in line with the aging population. However, the decision between surgical and non-surgical intervention for type II fractures in the elderly remains controversial. PurposeThe present study aims to synthesize the current published literature comparing outcomes following surgical and non-surgical interventions for type II odontoid fractures in the elderly population (≥65 years old). Study design/settingSystematic review and meta-analysis were performed. MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Progress & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed to identify available evidence in English language. Studies with extractable data for all type II odontoid fractures in participants aged 65 years or older and which compared surgical and non-surgical intervention were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Downs & Black checklist. Primary outcomes were mortality at short-term follow-up (≤3 months), mortality at long-term follow-up (predetermined study endpoint or mean follow-up length), and radiological union rate. Funding was provided by The University of Edinburgh for travel expenses to present this paper at the Society of British Neurological Sciences 2016 Conference ($170). ResultsTwelve studies (n=1,098), all non-randomized, met eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was particularly poor in the confounding, bias, and power domains of assessment. Substantial methodological and statistical heterogeneity allowed only a narrative synthesis of the primary outcomes. Overall, data on mortality at short-term follow-up appeared to favor neither surgical nor non-surgical intervention. A small favorable outcome in surgically managed patients over non-surgically managed patients in terms of mortality at long-term follow-up was not proven conclusive because of considerable heterogeneity in study methodologies. Inadequate reporting of the time point of union assessment introduced the potential for significant intra- and interstudy heterogeneity and precluded assessment of union rates. ConclusionsEvidence on this controversial topic is sparse, markedly heterogeneous, and of poor quality. Well-designed prospective trials adhering to guidance published by the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative are required to inform clinical practice on this contentious but growing issue. Future randomized controlled trials should include an assessment of frailty and medical comorbidities with suitable patients subsequently randomized to surgical or non-surgical treatment.
机译:BackgrudContoid过程骨折,其中II型构成大多数,是老年人人口中发病率和死亡率的越来越重要的原因。老年型II型骨折的发病率与老化人群稳步增加。然而,老年人在II型骨折的外科和非外科干预之间的决定仍然存在争议。目前的研究旨在综合当前公开的文献比较患者在老年人口(≥65岁)中的II型同胞骨折骨折后的外科和非手术干预措施。研究设计/设置系统审查和META分析。 MethaSA系统搜索Medline,Medline正在进行的未索引引用,Embase和Cochrane中央登记册(中央),以确定以英语为单位的可用证据。在65岁或以上的参与者中的所有II型同胞骨折的可提取数据的研究,并且包括涉及比较的手术和非手术干预。使用下载和黑色清单评估方法质量。主要结果是短期随访(≤3个月)的死亡率,长期随访的死亡率(预定的研究终点或平均随访)和放射性联盟率。爱丁堡大学提供资金,以便在英国神经科学学会2016年大会上展示本文(170美元)。结果Welve研究(n = 1,098),所有非随机化,符合资格标准。在评估的混淆,偏见和动力领域中,方法论质量特别差。实质性的方法论和统计异质性仅允许叙事的初级结果合成。总体而言,短期随访的死亡数据似乎有利于外科手术和非手术干预。由于研究方法中的相当大的异质性,在长期随访中,在长期后续的死亡率方面,在非手术治疗患者中的小良好良好的结果并未被证明是确凿的。报告联合评估的时间点的报告介绍了显着的内术和缺口异质性和对联盟率的排除评估。结论这种有争议的话题稀疏,明显异质,质量差。坚持加强流行病学(频闪)倡议的观察研究报告所公布的指导的精心设计的预期审判被要求为临床实践提供争议但不断增长的问题。未来随机对照试验应包括对脆弱和医疗合并症的评估,其中适合随后随机随机或非手术治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号