...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Meta-analysis of Usefulness of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Central Sleep Apnea
【24h】

Meta-analysis of Usefulness of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Central Sleep Apnea

机译:中枢睡眠呼吸暂停中膈神经刺激有用性的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Transvenous neurostimulation of the phrenic nerve (PNS) is a potentially improved and unique approach to the treatment of central sleep apnea (CSA). There have been multiple studies with limited individuals evaluating the efficacy of PNS. Our aim was to review and pool those studies to better understand whether phrenic nerve stimulation is efficacious in the treatment of CSA. The initial search on Pubmed retrieved a total of 97 articles and after screening all articles, only 5 could be included in our quantitative analysis. Pooling of data from 5 studies with a total of 204 patients demonstrated a reduction of mean apnea hypopnea index with PNS compared to controls by -26.7 events/hour with 95% confidence interval and P value of [CI (-31.99, -21.46), I-2 85, p 0.00]. The mean difference in central apnea index was -22.47 [CI (-25.19, -19.76), I-2 0, p 0.00]. The mean reduction in the oxygen desaturation index of 4% or more demonstrated a decrease in PNS group by -24.16 events/hour [(CI -26.20, -22.12), I-2 0, p 0.00] compared with controls. PNS resulted in mean reduction in arousal index of -13.77 [CI (-16.15, -11.40), I-2 0, p 0.00]. The mean change in percent of time spent in rapid eye movement sleep demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in PNS group by 1.01 % [CI (-5.67, 7.86), I(2)93, p 0.75]. In conclusion, PNS therapy for treating CSA demonstrated positive outcomes but larger randomized studies are needed to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:膈神经(PNS)的吞咽性神经刺激是一种潜在的改善和独特的方法,用于治疗中央睡眠呼吸暂停(CSA)。已经有多种研究,有限的个体评估PNS的功效。我们的目标是审查和汇集这些研究以更好地了解膈神经刺激是否有效地治疗CSA。 Pubmed的初始搜索中检索了97篇文章,并在筛选所有物品之后,只有5个可以包含在我们的定量分析中。与共有204名患者共有5项研究的数据汇集了与PNS的平均呼吸暂停次阅,与对照组的平均呼吸暂停次级指数为-26.7事件/小时,[CI(-31.99,21.46), I-2 85,p 0.00]。中央呼吸暂停指数的平均差异为-22.47 [CI(-25.19,-19.76),I-2 0,p 0.00]。 4%或更大的氧除尘指数的平均降低证明了PNS组的降低-24.16次赛事/小时[(CI -26.20,22.12),I-2 0,P 0.00]与对照相比。 PNS导致唤醒指数的平均降低-13.77 [CI(-16.15,-11.40),I-2 0,p 0.00]。在快速眼运动睡眠中花费的时间百分比的平均变化显示了PNS组的不显着增加1.01%[CI(-5.67,7.86),I(2)93,P 0.75]。总之,治疗CSA的PNS疗法证明了阳性结果,但需要大规模的随机研究来评估安全性和临床结果。 (c)由elsevier公司发布的2020年

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号