...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Gender Differences in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Choice and Outcome in Patients ≥75 Years of Age with Heart Failure
【24h】

Gender Differences in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Choice and Outcome in Patients ≥75 Years of Age with Heart Failure

机译:心脏重新同步治疗装置的性别差异≥75岁的心力衰竭患者的选择和结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for heart failure and can be delivered through a CRT pacemaker (CRT-P) or a CRT defibrillator (CRT-D). CRT-P devices are smaller and less expensive, have better battery longevity, and have been subject to fewer recalls and advisories but cannot deliver high-energy shocks to terminate potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. As published guidelines do not distinguish between CRT-P and CRT-D indications, we examined the practice of prescribing these devices in older women and men with heart failure. A total of 512 CRT recipients (age e75 years, 26% women, 21% CRT-P) were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics were collected on all patients, and overall survival was compared by gender and type of CRT device implanted. Women were more likely to receive CRT-Ps than men (26% vs 19%). Men with CRT-Ps were significantly older than women with CRT-Ps and both men and women with CRT-Ds (p = 0.04). In addition, women had lower all-cause mortality compared with men (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, confidence interval [CI] 0.58 to 0.99, p = 0.04), mainly among CRT-P recipients (HR 0.48, CI 0.26 to 0.8, p = 0.02), but this association was attenuated after adjusting for differences in patient characteristics (HR 0.56, CI 0.26 to 1.18, p = 0.13). In conclusion, women are more likely to receive CRT-Ps than men. Whether this difference is driven by patient preference or physician biases remains unclear. Women with CRT, particularly CRT-Ps, have a better overall survival than men. These differences, which may be driven by unbalanced baseline characteristics of patients or by differences in gender response to CRT, deserve further investigation.
机译:心脏重新同步治疗(CRT)是心力衰竭的既定疗法,可以通过CRT起搏器(CRT-P)或CRT除颤器(CRT-D)递送。 CRT-P器件较小,更便宜,具有更好的电池寿命,并且已经较少的召回和建议,但不能为终止可能的致死性心律失常提供高能量冲击。由于已发表的指南不区分CRT-P和CRT-D指示,我们检查了在老年妇女和男性中规定这些设备的做法。该分析中,共有512名CRT受者(年龄E75岁,26%女性,21%CRT-P)。所有患者收集基线特征,通过植入的CRT器件的性别和类型进行了整体存活。女性更有可能接受CRT-PS而不是男性(26%vs 19%)。 CRT-PS的男性比CRT-PS和CRT-PS的女性和CRT-DS的男性和女性(P = 0.04)大。此外,与男性相比,妇女的所有原因死亡率降低(危险比[HR] 0.75,置信区间[CI] 0.58至0.99,P = 0.04),主要是CRT-P接受者(HR 0.48,CI 0.26至0.8, P = 0.02),但在调整患者特征的差异(HR 0.56,CI 0.26至1.18,P = 0.13)时,该关联在调整差异后衰减。总之,妇女更有可能接受CRT-PS。这种差异是否受到患者偏好或医生偏见仍然不清楚。患有CRT,特别是CRT-PS的妇女,具有比男性更好的整体生存。这些差异可能是由患者的不平衡基线特征或性别反应对CRT的差异驱动的,值得进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号