首页> 外文期刊>The lancet oncology >Bendamustine followed by obinutuzumab and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL2-BAG): primary endpoint analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial
【24h】

Bendamustine followed by obinutuzumab and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL2-BAG): primary endpoint analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

机译:Bendamustine随后是慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL2袋)中的Obinutuzumab和Venetoclax:Multicentre,开放标签,第2期试验的主要终点分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundTargeted agents such as the type II anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab and the B-cell lymphoma-2 antagonist venetoclax have shown impressive therapeutic activity in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The CLL2-BAG trial was initiated to investigate the combination of these two agents in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. MethodsIn this ongoing multicentre, open-label, investigator-initiated phase 2 trial, patients (aged ≥18 years) with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia requiring treatment according to the 2008 International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) criteria and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 were enrolled at 16 sites in Germany. Patients with a relevant tumour load (absolute lymphocyte count ≥25?000 cells per μL or lymph nodes with a diameter of ≥5 cm) received sequential treatment of debulking with two cycles of bendamustine (70 mg/m2intravenously on days 1 and 2 of each of the two 28-day cycles), followed by induction and maintenance with obinutuzumab (1000 mg intravenously on days 1–2, 8, and 15 of the first induction cycle, every 4 weeks in induction cycles 2–6, and every 12 weeks in the maintenance phase) and oral venetoclax (starting in induction cycle 2 with 20 mg/day, with a weekly dose escalation over 5 weeks to the target dose of 400 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an overall response by investigator assessment at the end of induction treatment. All patients who received at least two induction cycles were included in the efficacy analyses and all patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT02401503. FindingsBetween May 6, 2015, and Jan 4, 2016, 66 patients were enrolled (35 treatment naive and 31 with relapsed or refractory disease), three of whom were excluded from the efficacy analysis because they received fewer than two induction cycles. Of the remaining 63 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population, 34 patients (54%) were treatment naive and 29 (46%) had relapsed or refractory disease. At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2017), all patients had completed induction treatment. At the end of the induction, 60 (95%) of 63 patients (95% CI 87–99) had responded, including all 34 patients in the treatment-naive cohort and 26 [90%] of 29 relapsed or refractory patients. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events during debulking were neutropenia and anaemia (five [11%] of 47 patients each), and thrombocytopenia and infection (three [6%] each). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events during induction were neutropenia (29 [44%] of 66 patients), infection (nine [14%]), thrombocytopenia (eight [12%]), infusion-related reactions (five [8%]), and secondary primary malignancy (four [6%]). 89 serious adverse events, including 69 related to study treatment, were reported. These serious adverse events were also mainly infections (four cases in four patients during debulking and 18 cases in 11 patients during induction) and cytopenia (four cases in four patients during debulking and ten cases in seven patients in induction). Five relapsed or refractory patients died: three cases of sepsis were deemed related to study treatment, whereas two deaths from Richter's transformation were not. InterpretationThe sequential application of bendamustine and obinutuzumab combined with venetoclax caused no unexpected or cumulative toxicities. The high proportion of patients who achieved overall responses, both treatment-naive and relapsed or refractory patients irrespective of physical fitness and genetic risk factors, compare favourably to established chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapies. Further follow-up will help to define whether the remissions with eradication of minimal residual disease achieved with this combination are durable after treatment discontinuation. FundingF Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie.
机译:背景明显的药剂如II型抗CD20抗体Obinutuzumab和B细胞淋巴瘤-2拮抗剂venetoclax在慢性淋巴细胞白血病中显示出令人印象深刻的治疗活性。启动CLL2袋试验以研究慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者这两种药剂的组合。方法对持续的多长期,开放标签,调查员发起的第2阶段试验,患者(年龄≥18岁),慢性淋巴细胞白血病需要治疗,根据2008年慢性淋巴细胞白血病(IWCLL)标准和东方合作肿瘤组绩效0-2的地位纳入德国的16个站点。相关肿瘤载荷的患者(直径≥5cm的绝对淋巴细胞计数≥25Ω或淋巴结)接受了用两次弯曲的双次循环(70mg / m 2和每次20mg / m 2循环的序列处理在两个28天的循环中,随后用obinutuzumab诱导和维持(在第一个诱导循环的第1-2,8天,8天,8天,80毫克,诱导循环中每4周,每12周均为每12周在维护阶段)和口服尿蛋白(在诱导循环2中开始,20mg /天开始,每周剂量升级超过5周,靶剂量为400mg /天)。主要终点是在诱导治疗结束时通过调查员评估实现整体反应的患者的比例。所有接受至少两个诱导循环的患者都包含在疗效分析中,并且所有接受至少一剂研究药物的患者都包含在安全分析中。本研究是用克里诺克氏菌市注册.gov,numbernnct02401503。 Findingsborween 5月6日,2016年1月4日,66名患者注册(35名幼稚和31例,复发或难治疾病),其中三个被排除在疗效分析之外,因为它们越来越少于两个诱导循环。在疗效评价群体中剩余的63名患者中,34名患者(54%)是治疗幼稚,29例(46%)复发或难治性疾病。在数据截止(2017年2月28日),所有患者都完成了诱导治疗。在诱导结束时,60名(95%)63名患者(95%CI 87-99)答复,包括所有34名患者在治疗 - 天真的队列中,26例(29%)的29例复发或难治性患者。在去保险期间最常见的3-4级不良事件是中性粒细胞贫症和贫血(每种患者的47名[11%]),血小板减少和感染(每次三[6%])。在诱导过程中最常见的3-4级不良事件是中性粒细胞病(29 [44%] 66名患者),感染(九[14%]),血小板减少症(八[12%]),输液相关的反应(五[8] %])和继发性初级恶性肿瘤(四[6%])。报告了89例严重不良事件,包括69例与研究治疗有关。这些严重的不良事件也主要是感染(在诱导期间,在诱导期间的4例患者中4例患者的4例)和细胞贫症(4例患者在诱导中的7例患者中有四种病例)。五个复发或难治性患者死亡:三种脓毒症患者被认为与学习治疗有关,而来自Richter的转化的两次死亡则不是。解释弯曲甘氨酸和奥比特替努巴的顺序施用结合威尼索克克克斯没有意外或累积毒性。无论身体健康和遗传危险因素如何,均达到整体反应的高比例均致响应,无论是物理健康和遗传危险因素如何,都比建立了慢性淋巴细胞白血病疗法。进一步的后续随访将有助于确定在治疗停止后耐用的消除达到最小残留疾病的剩余疾病。 Fundingf Hoffmann-La Roche和Abbvie。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The lancet oncology》 |2018年第9期|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department III of Internal Medicine University Hospital Ulm;

    Department III of Internal Medicine University Hospital Munich Ludwig-Maximilians-University;

    Gesundheitszentrum St Marien;

    Stauferklinikum Schw?bisch-Gmünd;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department III of Internal Medicine University Hospital Rostock;

    Department of Internal Medicine II Campus Kiel University of Schleswig-Holstein;

    Department of Internal Medicine II Campus Kiel University of Schleswig-Holstein;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department III of Internal Medicine University Hospital Ulm;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

    Department I of Internal Medicine and Center of Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn German CLL Study;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号