...
首页> 外文期刊>The journals of gerontology. Series B. Psychological sciences and social sciences >Caregiving to Older Adults: Determinants of Informal Caregivers' Subjective Well-being and Formal and Informal Support as Alleviating Conditions
【24h】

Caregiving to Older Adults: Determinants of Informal Caregivers' Subjective Well-being and Formal and Informal Support as Alleviating Conditions

机译:照顾老年人:非正式护理人员的主观福祉和正式和非正式支持的决定因素是减轻条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: In response to concerns about the sustainability of health care systems that increasingly rely on informal care, we first investigate explanations of informal caregivers' subjective well-being: primary stressors (care-receivers' cognitive impairment, functional disability, and problem behavior), primary appraisal (hours of informal caregiving), and secondary appraisal (burden). Second, we investigate the extent that formal (professional home care) and informal support (from other caregivers/volunteers and from family/friends) alleviate well-being losses due to informal care provision. We modified the stress-appraisal model to explicitly include buffering effects of support. Method: We analyzed 4,717 dyads of Dutch informal caregivers and their older care-receivers from the Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet with multilevel techniques. Results: Caregivers' subjective well-being was directly correlated with burden, hours of informal caregiving, and problem behavior of care-receivers. It was indirectly correlated with care-receivers' cognitive impairment and functional disability. Formal and informal support weakened the positive relationship between primary stressors and caregiving hours. Discussion: Modification of the stress-appraisal model appears useful as it identifies which sources of support buffer at which stages of the stress process. Findings suggest that cutbacks in formal/professional care may aggravate negative wellbeing outcomes of informal caregiving and compromise informal caregivers' labor market participation.
机译:目标:为应对担心越来越依赖非正式护理的医疗保健系统的可持续性,我们首先调查非正式护理人员主观福祉的解释:主要压力源(护理 - 接收者的认知障碍,功能残疾和问题行为) ,初级评估(数小时的非正式关注)和次要评估(负担)。其次,我们调查正式(专业家庭护理)和非正式支持(来自其他护理人员/志愿者和家庭/朋友)的程度,由于非正式护理规定,减轻了幸福的损失。我们修改了应力评估模型,明确地包括支持的缓冲效果。方法:从老年人和非正式护理人员分析了荷兰非正式护理人员及其旧护理接收器的4,717个二元,并通过多级技术调查最低数据集。结果:护理人员的主观福祉与负担,非正式的照顾时间和护理接收器的问题行为直接相关。它与护理接收者的认知障碍和功能残疾间接相关。正式和非正式的支持削弱了主要压力源和护理时间之间的积极关系。讨论:应力评估模型的修改似乎有用,因为它识别应力过程的阶段的支持缓冲区的哪个来源。调查结果表明,正式/专业护理中的削减可能会加剧非正式护理和妥协非正式护理人员劳动力市场参与的负面的福祉结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号