首页> 外文期刊>The Neurohospitalist >Clinical Decision-Making for Thrombolysis of Acute Minor Stroke Using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis
【24h】

Clinical Decision-Making for Thrombolysis of Acute Minor Stroke Using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis

机译:使用自适应联合分析临床决策急性轻微中风溶栓分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: There is practice variability in the treatment of patients with minor ischemic stroke with thrombolysis. We sought to determine which clinical factors physicians prioritize in thrombolysis decision-making for minor stroke using adaptive conjoint analysis. Methods: We conducted our conjoint analysis using the Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of all possible Alternatives methodology via the lOOOMinds platform to design an online preference survey and circulated it to US physicians involved in stroke care. We evaluated 6 clinical attributes: language/speech deficits, motor deficits, other neurological deficits, history suggestive of increased risk of complication from thrombolysis, age, and premorbid disability. Survey participants were asked to choose between pairs of treatment scenarios with various clinical attributes; scenarios automatically adapted based on participants' prior responses. Preference weights representing the relative importance of each attribute were compared using unadjusted paired t tests. Statistical significance was set at a — .05. Results: Fifty-four participants completed the survey; 61% were vascular neurologists and 93% worked in academic centers. All neurological deficits were ranked higher than age, premorbid status, or potential contraindications to thrombolysis. Differences between each successive mean preference weight were significant: motor (3 1.7%, standard deviation [SD]: 9.5), language/speech (24.1 %, SD: 9.6), other neurological deficits (16.6%, SD: 6.4), premorbid status (12.9%, SD: 6.6), age (10.1%, SD: 6.3), and potential thrombolysis contraindication (4.7%, SD: 4.4). Conclusion: In a conjoint analysis, surveyed US physicians in academic practice assigned greater weight to motor and speech/ language deficits than other neurological deficits, patient age, relative contraindications to thrombolysis, and premorbid disability when deciding to thrombolyse patients with minor stroke.
机译:介绍:溶栓治疗轻微缺血性卒中患者的实践变异性。我们试图确定使用适应性联合分析的轻微中风溶栓决策优先考虑哪些临床因素。方法:我们使用潜在的所有替代品方法进行了联合分析,通过废气印度平台来设计在线偏好调查,并将其传送给参与中风护理的美国医生。我们评估了6个临床属性:语言/言语缺陷,电机缺陷,其他神经缺陷,历史暗示溶栓,年龄和前眠性残疾的复杂性风险增加。要求调查参与者在具有各种临床属性的治疗方案对之间选择;场景根据参与者的先前答复自动调整。使用未调整的配对T测试进行比较代表每个属性的相对重要性的偏好权重。统计显着性设定为a - .05。结果:五十四名参与者完成了调查; 61%是血管神经科医生,93%的学术中心工作。所有神经系统缺陷都被排名高于年龄,前膜状态,或溶栓的潜在禁忌症。每个连续平均偏好重量之间的差异是显着的:电机(3 1.7%,标准差[SD]:9.5),语言/语音(24.1%,SD:9.6),其他神经缺陷(16.6%,SD:6.4),预血基状态(12.9%,SD:6.6),年龄(10.1%,SD:6.3)和潜在的溶栓禁忌症(4.7%,SD:4.4)。结论:在联合分析中,学术实践中的美国医师对电机和语言缺陷的重量比其他神经系统缺陷,患者年龄,相对禁忌症对溶栓,以及在决定血栓栓塞患者的轻微中风患者时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号