首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Blame it on the injury: Trauma is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy compared with elective resection
【24h】

Blame it on the injury: Trauma is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy compared with elective resection

机译:归咎于损伤:创伤是胰岛素后远端胰腺切除术后的胰腺瘘的危险因素与选择性切除相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant source of morbidity following distal pancreatectomy (DP). There is a lack of information regarding the impact of trauma on POPF rates when compared with elective resection. We hypothesize that trauma will be a significant risk factor for the development of POPF following DP. METHODS A retrospective, single-institution review of all patients undergoing DP from 1999 to 2017 was performed. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing DP for traumatic injury to those undergoing elective resection. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4). RESULTS Of the 372 patients who underwent DP during the study period, 298 met inclusion criteria: 38 DPs for trauma (TDP), 260 elective DPs (EDP). Clinically significant grade B or C POPFs occurred in 17 (44.7%) of 38 TDPs compared with 41 (15.8%) of 260 EDPs (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, traumatic injury was found to be independently predictive of developing a grade B or C POPF (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.10-8.89). Age, sex, and wound infection were highly correlated with traumatic etiology and therefore were not retained in the multivariable model. When analyzing risk factors for each group (trauma vs. elective) separately, we found that TDP patients who developed POPFs had less sutured closure of their duct, higher infectious complications, and longer hospital stays, while EDP patients that suffered POPFs were more likely to be male, younger in age, and at a greater risk for infectious complications. Lastly, in a subgroup analysis involving only patients with drains left postoperatively, trauma was an independent predictor of any grade of fistula (A, B, or C) compared with elective DP (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.09-24.15), suggesting that traumatic injury is risk factor for pancreatic stump closure disruption following DP. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this study represents the largest cohort of patients comparing pancreatic leak rates in traumatic versus elective DP, and demonstrates that traumatic injury is an independent risk factor for developing an ISGPF grade B or C pancreatic fistula following DP.
机译:背景技术术后胰瘘(POPF)在远端胰腺切除术(DP)后仍然是发病率的重要来源。与选修切除相比,缺乏有关创伤对波普夫率的影响的信息。我们假设创伤将是DP开发POPF的重要风险因素。方法对1999年至2017年患者进行了回顾性,单机构审查,从1999年至2017年进行的所有患者。在接受选修切除的人进行创伤性损伤的患者之间比较结果。使用SAS(9.4版)进行单变量和多变量分析。在研究期间接受DP的372名患者的结果,298符合纳入标准:38 dps用于创伤(TDP),260个选举DPS(EDP)。临床显着的B或C POPF在17个(44.7%)的38 TDP中发生,而41(15.8%)260 EDP(P <0.0001)。关于多变量分析,发现创伤损伤是独立预测培养B级或C POPF(差距,4.3; 95%置信区间,2.10-8.89)。年龄,性和伤口感染与创伤病因有高度相关,因此在多变量模型中没有保留。当分别分析每个群体的风险因素(Trauma与选修课)时,我们发现开发POPFS的TDP患者缝合缝合闭合,传染性并发​​症较高,以及较长的医院住宿,而EDP患者遭受突出的POPFS更有可能是男性,年轻的年龄,感染性并发症的风险更大。最后,在涉及术后脱落的患者的亚组分析中,创伤是与选修DP(赔率比,8.6; 95%置信区间,3.09-24.15)相比任何瘘管(A,B或C)的独立预测因子(A,B或C)。 ),表明创伤性损伤是DP后胰腺树桩闭合破坏的危险因素。结论我们的知识,该研究代表了比较创伤性与选修DP的胰腺泄漏率的最大患者队列,并表明创伤损伤是开发DP后的ISGPF级B或C胰腺瘘的独立危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号