首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Does computed tomography scan add any diagnostic value to the evaluation of stab wounds of the anterior abdominal wall? A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Does computed tomography scan add any diagnostic value to the evaluation of stab wounds of the anterior abdominal wall? A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:是否计算了断层扫描扫描将任何诊断值添加到前腹壁的刺伤伤口的评估? 系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) scan adds any diagnostic value in the evaluation of stab wounds of the anterior abdominal wall as compared with serial clinical examination (SCE). METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE via Ovid were systematically searched for records published from 1980 to 2018 by two independent researchers (M.G., R.L.). Quality assessment, data extraction, and analysis were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Mantel-Haenszel method with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) as the measure of effect size was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Three studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 2 observational studies) totaling 319 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall laparotomy rate was 12.8% (22 of 172 patients) in SCE versus 19% (28 of 147 patients) in CT. This difference was not significant (OR [95% CI], 0.63 [0.34-1.16];p= 0.14). Negative laparotomy rate was 3.5% (6 of 172 patients) in SCE versus 5.4% (8 of 147 patients) in CT. The difference was not significant (OR [95% CI], 0.61 [0.20-1.83];p= 0.37). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis compared SCE with CT scan in patients presenting with stab wounds of the anterior abdominal wall and provided level II evidence showing no additional benefit in CT scan. Further observational and experimental clinical studies are needed to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.
机译:背景技术该系统审查和荟萃分析的目的是评估计算机断层摄影(CT)扫描是否在与连续临床检查(SCE)相比的刺伤刺伤的评估中添加任何诊断值。方法通过两个独立研究人员(M.G.,R.L.)系统地搜索PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆和Medline Via OVID通过OVID的记录,从1980年到2018年出版根据Cochrane手册进行质量评估,数据提取和分析,用于系统性审查的干预措施。用于效果大小的效果比(或)和95%置信区间(95%CI)的Mantel-Haenszel方法用于效果大小的测量。结果荟萃分析中应包括319名患者的三项研究(1个随机对照试验和2项观测研究)。 SCE的整体剖腹手术率为12.8%(172名患者中的22例,共147名患者中的28例)。这种差异不显着(或[95%CI],0.63 [0.34-1.16]; p = 0.14)。阴性剖腹术率为3.5%(172名患者中的6名,共172名患者中的6个),CT中的5.4%(147名患者中的8例中有8例)。差异不显着(或[95%CI],0.61 [0.20-1.83]; p = 0.37)。结论该荟萃分析与患有前腹壁刺伤的患者的CT扫描与CT扫描相比,并提供了II级证据,显示CT扫描中没有额外的益处。需要进一步的观察和实验临床研究来确认该Meta分析的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号