...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT classification for immediate implant placement
【24h】

Radial plane tooth position and bone wall dimensions in the anterior maxilla: A CBCT classification for immediate implant placement

机译:径向平面牙齿位置和前颌骨骨壁尺寸:即时植入物放置的CBCT分类

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Statement of problemThe biological and esthetic challenge of the post-extraction ridge is relevant to restorative implant dentistry, most significantly in the anterior esthetic zone. Previous authors have discussed facial bone wall dimensions and classified their variations. A reclassification may be pertinent. PurposeThe purpose of this observational, clinical study was to introduce a new classification system for anterior maxilla tooth position with guidelines for immediate implant placement. Data for facial and palatal bone wall height and thickness are also presented. Material and methodsMaxillary anterior teeth (n=591) were analyzed as viewed in the radial plane of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 150 patients. Each tooth was classified according to its position and inclination within its alveolus (class I, middle of the alveolus; IA, thick facial bone; IB, thin facial bone; class II, retroclined; IIA, thick crestal bone; IIB, thin crestal bone; class III, proclined; class IV, facially outside bone envelope; class V, both thin facial and palatal bone with apical isthmus). Bone thickness was measured for both facial and palatal walls at the following points: crestal (A), mid-root (B), apex (C), and 4 mm beyond the apex. Bone wall height was also evaluated. ResultsA thin facial bone wall predominated (≤1 mm) at the crest (83%) and the mid-root point (92%). Most palatal walls were thin (<1 mm) at the crest (63%) and thick (≥2 mm) at the mid-root point (98%) and apex (99%). Class I tooth position accounted for 6.1%, class II for 76.5%, class III for 9.5%, class IV for 7.3%, and class V for 0.7%. ConclusionsMaxillary anterior teeth have predominantly thin facial bones, making palatal bone thickness a crucial variable. The new classification system for radial plane tooth position is a pragmatic clinical analysis for immediate implant treatment planning.
机译:问题陈述后芦苇后芦苇的生物和美学挑战与恢复性植入物牙科有关,最大明显在前近审区。以前的作者讨论了面部骨墙尺寸并分类了它们的变化。重新分类可能是相关的。目的的目的的目的,临床研究是为前颌骨位置引入新的分类系统,具有直接植入物的准则。还提出了面部和腭骨壁高度和厚度的数据。在从150名患者的锥形光束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描中观察,分析了材料和方法的前齿(n = 591)。根据其肺泡内的位置和倾斜(IA,肺泡中间,厚面部骨; IB,薄面骨; II类,肾上腺骨; III,厚嵴骨; IIB,薄嵴骨; IIb,薄嵴骨; IIb,薄嵴骨; III,薄嵴骨; IIb,薄冠骨; IIb,薄嵴骨; ; III类,被普通的; IV类,面基本骨骼外壳; V类,两种薄的面部和腭骨,具有顶端肌肉。在以下几点处针对面部和腭壁测量骨厚度:嵴(A),中药(B),顶点(C)和4mm之外,超出顶点。还评估了骨壁高度。结果在嵴(83%)和中药处(92%)主导(≤1mm)。在中央点(98%)和顶点(99%),大多数腭壁在嵴(63%)和厚(≥2mm)薄(≥2mm)。 I级牙齿立场占6.1%,II级为76.5%,III级为9.5%,第IV级,7.3%,V级,V级为0.7%。结论Maxillary牙齿主要具有薄薄的面部骨骼,使腭骨厚度是至关重要的变量。径向平面牙齿位置的新分类系统是即时植入治疗计划的务实临床分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号