首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of hospital infection >Should central venous catheters be rapidly removed to treat Staphylococcus aureus related-catheter bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) in neonates and children? An 8-year period (2010-2017) retrospective analysis in a French University Hospital
【24h】

Should central venous catheters be rapidly removed to treat Staphylococcus aureus related-catheter bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) in neonates and children? An 8-year period (2010-2017) retrospective analysis in a French University Hospital

机译:如果中央静脉导管应该快速去除,以治疗新生儿和儿童的金黄色葡萄球菌相关导管血流感染(CR-BSI)吗? 一个8年期(2010-2017)在法国大学医院的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) treatment is based on empiric anti-biotherapy associated with or without catheter removal. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of failures in neonates and children with Staphylococcus aureus CR-BSI with or without rapid catheter removal. Treatment failure was defined as the persistence of positive blood cultures, onset or aggravation of a local or systemic complication, or relapse. Fifty-four CR-BSI in 225 patients were analysed (33 and 21 conservative and non-conservative treatments) with three and 10 failures, respectively (P<0.002). Non-conservative treatment with rapid catheter removal seems to be associated with a significantly lower failure rate and should be recommended. (C) 2019 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:导管相关的血流感染(CR-BSI)治疗基于与或没有导管的透视抗生物疗法。 本研究的目的是将新生儿和儿童的失败的发病率与葡萄球菌CR-BSI的失败与有或没有快速的导管去除。 治疗失败被定义为阳性血液培养,发病或加重局部或全身并发症或复发的持续存在。 分析了225名患者的五十四个CR-BSI(33和21例保守和非保守治疗),分别有三和10个故障(P <0.002)。 具有快速导管去除的非保守治疗似乎与显着降低的故障率相关,并且应建议使用。 (c)2019年医疗保健感染协会。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号