首页> 外文期刊>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine >Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial

机译:剖腹产段对剖腹产闭合的刺绣缝合线与常规缝线; 随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The aim of this randomized control trial was to compare the operative data and the early postoperative outcomes of cesarean sections in which the uterine incision was closed with a barbed suture (STRATAFIX (TM) Spiral PDO Knotless Tissue Control Device, SXPD2B405, Ethicon Inc.) with those of cesarean sections in which the uterine incision was closed with a conventional smooth suture (VICRYL (TM); Ethicon Inc.). Materials and methods: One hundred pregnant patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the Stratafix group or the Vicryl group. The uterine incision was closed by two layers of sutures in both groups. In the Vicryl group, the first layer was continuous and the second layer was interrupted. In the Stratafix group, both layers were continuous. Results: The uterine closure time was significantly lower in the Stratafix group (224 +/- 46 versus 343 +/- 75 s, p .001). Operative time was comparable between both groups. Twelve patients in the Vicryl group and two patients in the Stratafix group required additional sutures to achieve hemostasis (p value = .009). The mean blood loss during closure of uterine incision and mean hospital stay were lower in the Stratafix group but these differences failed to reach statistical significance. Conclusion: The use of barbed suture for uterine incision closure at cesarean section is associated with shorter uterine closure time and similar early perioperative complications compared with conventional smooth suture. The difference between both groups in the technique of suturing the second layer of the uterine incision may be the cause of the reduction in the uterine closure time and the need for additional sutures to achieve hemostasis during suturing the uterine incision with a barbed suture. Further, well designed randomized controlled trials should be conducted to investigate the association between the type of suture (barbed or conventional smooth) and remote complications of cesarean section (infertility, pelvic pain, abnormal placentation and rupture uterus).
机译:介绍:该随机控制试验的目的是比较操作数据和剖宫产的早期术后结果,其中子宫切口用刺缝合(Stratafix(TM)螺旋PDO结膜组织控制装置,SXPD2B405,Ethicon Inc 。)用剖腹产细分部分,其中子宫切口用常规光滑的缝合线(vicryl(tm); ethicon Inc.)。材料和方法:百年孕妇患者在1:1的比例中随机化到Stratafix组或vicryl组。在两个组中,子宫切口闭合两层缝合线。在vicryl组中,第一层是连续的,第二层被中断。在StrataFix组中,两层都是连续的。结果:Stratafix组中子宫闭合时间显着较低(224 +/- 46与343 +/- 75 s,p& .001)。两组之间的操作时间是可比的。在vicryl组中的12名患者和斯特拉菲克斯组中的两名患者需要额外的缝合线来实现止血(P值= .009)。在Stratafix组中闭合子宫切口和平均住院入住期间的平均失血,但这些差异未能达到统计学意义。结论:在剖宫产中使用倒钩缝合物对子宫切口闭合的闭合时间与传统光滑缝合线相比的子宫闭合时间和类似的早期围手术期并发症有关。在缝合第二层子宫切口的技术中,两个组之间的差异可以是子宫闭合时间减少的原因,并且需要额外的缝合线在缝合子宫切口期间实现止血,并且具有倒钩缝合线。此外,应进行精心设计的随机对照试验,以研究缝合线(倒钩或常规光滑)和剖宫产的远程并发症之间的关联(不孕,盆腔疼痛,异常映射和子宫)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号