...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology: Official Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology >Precision and Bias of Target‐Controlled Prolonged Propofol Infusion for General Anesthesia and Sedation in Neurosurgical Patients
【24h】

Precision and Bias of Target‐Controlled Prolonged Propofol Infusion for General Anesthesia and Sedation in Neurosurgical Patients

机译:靶控制延长异丙酚输注的精度和偏见,全身麻醉和神经外科患者的镇静

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract The aim of this study was to determine the relationship, precision, and bias of a propofol target‐controlled infusion (TCI) system during prolonged infusion in neurosurgical patients. We retrospectively included patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective neurosurgical removal of brain tumors and postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit over a period of 3 months. TCI of propofol (Diprifusor – Marsh model) and remifentanil were used for general anesthesia and sedation. We compared propofol blood concentration (C meas ) measured by liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy with predicted concentrations (C pred ) by the TCI system at 40?minutes (T0), 2?hours (T1), and 4?hours (T2) and every 8 hours after starting the drug infusion and at the time of emergence from sedation. Ninety‐four paired determinations of C meas and C pred from 15 adult ASA I patients (8 men and 7 women 54.9?±?13 years old; BMI, 24?±?3.2 kg/m 2 ) were analyzed. Mean duration of drug administration was 31?±?6?hours. The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of the linear regression model for the relationship of C meas and C pred was 0.43. At the time of emergence, C meas was 0.5?±?0.18?μg/mL. The bias of the TCI system (median performance error) was ‐34.7%, and the precision (median absolute performance error) was 36%. Wobble and divergence were 0.3% and 12.3%, respectively. This study found bias of the system out of the range of tolerability and showed a high tendency toward overestimation. These findings may lead to undersedation when propofol TCI is used for prolonged infusion.
机译:摘要本研究的目的是在神经外科患者长期输注期间确定异丙酚靶控制输注(TCI)系统的关系,精度和偏差。我们回顾性地包括在3个月的时间内接受全身麻醉的患者进行选修神经外科脑肿瘤和重症监护病房的术后镇静。 TCI的异丙酚(Diprifusor - Marsh模型)和雷芬丹尼尔用于全身麻醉和镇静。我们将通过液相色谱 - 质谱比较了通过液相色谱 - 质谱(C MEAS)与预测浓度(C pred)在40?分钟(T0),2小时(T1)和4?小时(T2)和4?小时(T2)和在开始药物输液和镇静时,每8小时一次。来自15名成人ASA患者的C MEA和C检测的九十四个成对测定(8名男子和7名女性54.9?±13岁; BMI,24?±3.2 kg / m 2)。药物管理的平均持续时间为31?±6?小时。 C MEA和C PEAT关系的线性回归模型的确定系数(R 2)为0.43。在出现时,C MEA为0.5?±0.18Ω·μg/ mL。 TCI系统(中值性能误差)的偏差为-34.7%,精度(中位绝对性能误差)为36%。摇摆和分裂分别为0.3%和12.3%。该研究发现系统的偏置在耐受性范围之外,并且显示出高度估计的高趋势。当Purfol TCI用于长时间输注时,这些发现可能导致凹陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号