首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology: Official Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology >Monte Carlo Simulation Methodologies for β‐Lactam/β‐Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Effect on Probability of Target Attainment Assessments
【24h】

Monte Carlo Simulation Methodologies for β‐Lactam/β‐Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Effect on Probability of Target Attainment Assessments

机译:β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合的蒙特卡罗模拟方法:对目标达索评估概率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) are used in antibiotic development to predict the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment (PTA) for a dosing regimen. However, for β‐lactam/β‐lactamase inhibitor combinations (BL‐BLICs), methods for linking simulated concentration profiles of the β‐lactam (BL) and β‐lactamase inhibitor (BLI) components are rarely described. Using a previously defined pharmacokinetic model of ceftazidime/avibactam from critically ill patients, we performed four 5000‐patient MCSs using different methods of increasing complexity to couple the BL and BLI components and compared PTA for ceftazidime and avibactam targets of 70% f TMIC and 70% f T1 mg/L, respectively, at MICs from 1 to 128 mg/L. Method A ignored all covariates and correlations, whereas methods B, C, and D enhanced associations by adding (B) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug only; (C) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug and creatinine clearance (CRCL); and (D) pharmacokinetic parameter correlation within each drug, CRCL, and pharmacokinetic parameter correlation between drugs. Method D produced a simulated patient population that best recapitulated the observed relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters in actual patients. Ceftazidime/avibactam PTA at MIC 8 mg/L (the susceptibility break point) and 16 mg/L ranged from 92.4% to 98.3% and 80.2% to 88.4%, respectively. PTA was lowest with method A, whereas PTA estimates were similar for all other methods. Compared with ignoring all pharmacokinetic parameter associations, the inclusion of covariate relationships and parameter correlation between both components of ceftazidime/avibactam leads to fewer patients with discordant pharmacokinetic parameters and results in higher PTA. Consideration of these methodologies should guide future MCS analyses for BL‐BLIC.
机译:摘要蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)用于抗生素开发,以预测药物动力学靶达(PTA)对给药方案的概率。然而,对于β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(BL-BLICS),很少描述用于连接β-内酰胺(BL)和β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(BLI)组分的模拟浓度谱的方法。使用先前定义的头孢唑胺/ Avibactam的药代动力学模型来自批评患者,我们使用不同方法进行了四种5000患者MCS,这些方法增加了复杂性,将BL和BLI组分耦合,并对CEFTAZIDIME和AVIBACTAM靶标进行比较PTA。70%F T&GT ; MIC和& 70%F T> 1 mg / L,麦克风分别为1至128 mg / L.方法A忽略所有协变量和相关性,而通过仅在每种药物内添加(B)药代动力学参数相关来增强缔合的缔合。 (c)每种药物和肌酐清除(CRCL)的药代动力学参数相关性; (d)药代动力学参数相关性在每种药物,CRCL和药代动力学参数相关性的药物。方法D产生了一种模拟患者群,最能综合实际患者药代动力学参数之间观察到的关系。在MIC 8 mg / L(敏感性断裂点)和16mg / L处的Ceftazidime / Avibactam PTA分别为92.4%至98.3%和80.2%至88.4%。 PTA与方法A最低,而PTA估计对于所有其他方法类似。与忽略所有药代动力学参数关联相比,将CeTtazidime / Avibactam的两种组分之间包含协变性关系和参数相关性导致较少的患有不良药剂参数的患者,并导致更高的PTA。考虑这些方法应该指导未来的MCS对BL-BLIC分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号