...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Applied Poultry Research >Use of probiotics as an alternative to formaldehyde fumigation in commercial broiler chicken hatch cabinets
【24h】

Use of probiotics as an alternative to formaldehyde fumigation in commercial broiler chicken hatch cabinets

机译:使用益生菌作为商业肉鸡孵化柜中甲醛熏蒸的替代品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two experiments were conducted in a commercial broiler hatchery to evaluate the use of a spray probiotic formulation as an alternative method to control the bacterial bloom within a broiler hatch cabinet vs. formaldehyde fumigation. In Exp 1, 2 independent trials were conducted to compare hatchery sanitation between the current formaldehyde drip method vs. spray application of the probiotic. Hatchery sanitation was evaluated using the open-plate method at approximately 20% pip; 30% hatch; and 85% hatch for enumeration of total recovered nonselective aerobic bacteria (TAB); presumptive lactic acid bacteria (LAB); and total recovered Gram-negative bacteria (TGB). In Exp 2, 3 independent trials were conducted to evaluate the gastrointestinal (GIT) microbiota of neonatal chicks from hatch cabinets treated as in Exp 1. In Exp 1, in both trials, the application of the probiotic increased the number TAB and LAB present in the hatching environment (P & 0.05). Additionally, at 20% pip and 30% hatch, in both trials, there was no significant difference in TGB levels between the probiotic treatment and the formaldehyde treatment. In Exp. 2, chicks from probiotic treated hatch cabinets also showed a reduction of TGB in the GIT compared to the formaldehyde group (P & 0.05). In trial 3, the reduction in TGB persisted 24 h after hatch. The results of the present study suggest that spray application of a probiotic in commercial hatcheries can yield similar TGB levels when compared to formaldehyde early on in the hatch period. More importantly, it decreased the numbers of these bacteria within the GIT at hatch and 24 h after hatch.
机译:在商业肉鸡孵化场中进行了两种实验,以评估喷雾益生菌制剂作为一种替代方法,以控制肉鸡舱内在甲醛料斗中的细菌盛开。在EXP 1中,进行了2个独立试验,以比较目前甲醛滴水法与益生菌喷涂施用之间的孵化场卫生。使用大约20%点的开板法评估孵化场卫生; 30%舱口; 85%舱口舱口枚举总回收的非选择性有氧细菌(标签);推定乳酸菌(实验室);和总回收的革兰氏阴性细菌(TGB)。在EXP 2中,进行3种独立试验,以评估从exp1所处的舱口柜中新生儿雏鸡的胃肠道(Git)微生物。在exp 1,在两种试验中,益生菌的应用增加了数量标签和实验室孵化环境(P& 0.05)。此外,在两种试验中,在20%的piP和30%舱口中,益生菌治疗与甲醛处理之间的TGB水平无显着差异。在exp。如图2所示,益生菌经过处理的舱口箱的雏鸡还显示与甲醛基团(P& 0.05)相比,Git中的TGB减少。在试验3中,孵化后TGB的减少持续24小时。本研究结果表明,与孵化期的早期甲醛相比,在商业孵化器中喷涂益生菌在商业孵化器中可以产生类似的TGB水平。更重要的是,它在孵化后在舱口舱和24小时内降低了这些细菌内的这些细菌的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号