首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >Greater refill adherence to adalimumab therapy for patients using specialty versus retail pharmacies.
【24h】

Greater refill adherence to adalimumab therapy for patients using specialty versus retail pharmacies.

机译:使用专业药店与零售药店的患者对阿达木单抗疗法的笔芯依从性更高。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Retail pharmacies provide regular prescription drugs and some specialty prescription drugs, whereas specialty pharmacies focus on distributing specialty prescription drugs, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. It is unknown whether pharmacy type impacts patients' adherence to anti-TNF therapy. The relationship between pharmacy type (specialty vs. retail) and refill adherence to therapy with the TNF antagonist adalimumab was examined. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of dispensing records of patients in the United States who were prescribed a TNF antagonist (adalimumab 40 mg per 0.8-mL injection) during a dispensation period from January 2003 to August 2009. Patients treated with adalimumab were included in the analysis regardless of diagnosis. For each patient, medication refill adherence (MRA) was calculated as total days of supply divided by total number of days evaluated, multiplied by 100. A regression analysis was conducted in which the dependent variable was MRA and the independent variables included pharmacy type (specialty vs. retail pharmacy), reimbursement/payment type, copayment/payment amount per prescription, age, sex, ethnicity, and annual income. RESULTS: Of the 86,079 patients included, 70% obtained the medication from a specialty pharmacy, 92% were members of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans, 67% were women, and 81% were white. The average MRA was 84, and the average age was 52 years. Significant predictors (P<0.05) of MRA included pharmacy type, reimbursement/payment type, copayment/payment amount per prescription, age, sex, and ethnicity; and pharmacy type was the strongest predictor. When other independent variables were controlled for, MRA was 16% less for patients who used a retail pharmacy vs. patients who used a specialty pharmacy. CONCLUSION: Patients who used a specialty pharmacy to fulfill prescriptions for a TNF antagonist had a greater refill adherence than did patients who used a retail pharmacy.
机译:简介:零售药房提供常规处方药和一些特种处方药,而特种药房则专注于分销特种处方药,包括肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)拮抗剂。尚不清楚药房类型是否会影响患者对抗TNF治疗的依从性。检查了药房类型(专业与零售)和补充装对TNF拮抗剂阿达木单抗的依从性之间的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性分析,记录了2003年1月至2009年8月期间美国处方TNF拮抗剂(每0.8 mL注射阿达木单抗40毫克)的患者的配药记录。将接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者纳入研究范围无论诊断如何,分析。对于每位患者,按照补充总天数除以评估的总天数,再乘以100,计算出药物补充依从性(MRA)。进行回归分析,其中因变量为MRA,自变量包括药房类型(专业与零售药店),报销/付款类型,每张处方的共付款/付款金额,年龄,性别,种族和年收入。结果:在这86,079名患者中,有70%是从专科药房获得药物的,92%是Blue Cross和Blue Shield计划的成员,67%是女性,81%是白人。平均MRA为84,平均年龄为52岁。 MRA的重要预测因素(P <0.05)包括药房类型,报销/付款方式,每张处方的共付额/付款金额,年龄,性别和种族;而药房类型是最强的预测指标。当控制其他自变量时,使用零售药房的患者的MRA比使用专业药房的患者的MRA低16%。结论:使用专门药房来履行TNF拮抗剂处方的患者比使用零售药房的患者具有更高的笔芯依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号