首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of continuing education in the health professions >A Perfect Match? A Scoping Review of the Influence of Personality Matching on Adult Mentoring Relationships-Implications for Academic Medicine
【24h】

A Perfect Match? A Scoping Review of the Influence of Personality Matching on Adult Mentoring Relationships-Implications for Academic Medicine

机译:一场精彩的比赛? 人格匹配对学术医学影响的人格匹配影响的范围。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Mentoring is a widely regarded faculty development strategy in academic medicine. However, the lack of understanding about mentoring relationship dynamics limits effective recruitment, implementation, and evaluation. Despite decades of publications describing adult mentoring initiatives, few studies examine personality influence in mentoring relationships. This scoping review examined the extent, range, and nature of the research on personality matching in mentoring relationships, and identified research gaps in the literature. Methods: Scoping review methodology guided a search of six databases representing higher education, health sciences education, and professional contexts where mentoring is used. Consistent with the inclusive approach of a scoping review, authors included academic papers and other article types. Results: The scoping review yielded 39 articles. Literature mostly originated in the United States, publication sources represented multiple disciplines, and the context for the majority of articles was the workplace. The most common publication type was a research report. Although all articles addressed personality or mentoring, only three articles examined personality matching and its contribution to the mentoring relationship. Finally, although the Big Five personality traits were cited in multiple studies, other personality frameworks were used. Discussion: Academic medicine expends resources developing and supporting mentoring programs but there remains limited understanding of how best to identify and match mentors and proteges. Further understanding of the role of joint and unique personality traits in academic medicine mentoring relationships seems necessary, if the field continues to invest, time, money, and resources for mentoring programs.
机译:介绍:指导是学术医学中广泛认为的教师发展战略。然而,缺乏对辅导关系动态的理解限制了有效的招聘,实施和评估。尽管有数十年的出版物描述了成年指导举措,但很少有研究在辅导关系中检测人格影响。该裁视审查检测了在辅导关系中匹配的人格匹配的程度,范围和性质,并确定了文学中的研究差距。方法:范围审查方法是指出六个数据库,代表高等教育,健康科学教育以及使用指导的专业背景。符合范围审查的包容性方法,提交人包括学术论文和其他文章类型。结果:范围审查产生了39篇文章。文学主要是在美国,出版消息来源代表多个学科,大多数文章的背景是工作场所。最常见的出版物类型是研究报告。虽然所有文章都有人格或指导,但只有三篇文章审查了个性匹配,并对辅导关系的贡献。最后,尽管在多项研究中引用了大五个人格特质,但使用了其他个性框架。讨论:学术医学消耗资源开发和支持指导计划,但仍然有限地了解如何最好地识别和匹配导师和抗议。如果该领域继续投资,时间,金钱和资源,进一步了解在学术医学中的联合和独特的人格特质在学术中的作用,似乎是指导计划的时间,金钱和资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号