首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of health planning and management >Implementation process and quality of a primary health care system improvement initiative in a decentralized context: A A retrospective appraisal using the quality implementation framework
【24h】

Implementation process and quality of a primary health care system improvement initiative in a decentralized context: A A retrospective appraisal using the quality implementation framework

机译:在分散的背景下的初级医疗保健系统改进倡议的实施过程和质量:一种利用质量实施框架的回顾性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Background Effective implementation processes are essential in achieving desired outcomes of health initiatives. Whereas many approaches to implementation may seem straightforward, careful advanced planning, multiple stakeholder involvements, and addressing other contextual constraints needed for quality implementation are complex. Consequently, there have been recent calls for more theory‐informed implementation science in health systems strengthening. This study applies the quality implementation framework (QIF) developed by Meyers, Durlak, and Wandersman to identify and explain observed implementation gaps in a primary health care system improvement intervention in Nigeria. Methods We conducted a retrospective process appraisal by analyzing contents of 39 policy document and 15 key informant interviews. Using the QIF, we assessed challenges in the implementation processes and quality of an improvement model across the tiers of Nigeria's decentralized health system. Results Significant process gaps were identified that may have affected subnational implementation quality. Key challenges observed include inadequate stakeholder engagements and poor fidelity to planned implementation processes. Although needs and fit assessments, organizational capacity building, and development of implementation plans at national level were relatively well carried out, these were not effective in ensuring quality and sustainability at the subnational level. Conclusions Implementing initiatives between levels of governance is more complex than within a tier. Adequate preintervention planning, understanding, and engaging the various interests across the governance spectrum are key to improving quality.
机译:摘要背景技术有效实施过程对于实现期望的卫生倡议结果至关重要。然而,许多实施方法可能似乎是直接的,仔细的先进计划,多个利益相关者参与,并解决质量实施所需的其他上下文限制是复杂的。因此,最近呼吁在加强卫生系统方面进行更多理论上的实施科学。本研究适用于Meyers,Durlak和Wandersman开发的质量实施框架(QIF),以识别和解释在尼日利亚的主要医疗系统改进干预中观察到的实施差距。方法通过分析39个政策文件的内容和15个关键信息面试,进行了回顾性过程评估。使用QIF,我们在尼日利亚分散的卫生系统层面的改进模型的实施过程和质量方面评估了挑战。结果确定了可能影响了结构性质量的重大过程差距。所观察到的主要挑战包括利益相关者的参与不足,达到计划实施过程的良好忠诚。虽然在国家一级的需求和适应性评估,组织能力建设和实施计划的发展,但在进行的情况下进行,但这些无效确保了确保水性级别和可持续性。结论实施治理级别之间的举措比在一级内更复杂。适当的优先的计划,理解,并从事治理范围的各种兴趣是提高质量的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号