首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Possible missed opportunities for diagnosing colorectal cancer in Dutch primary care: a multimethods approach
【24h】

Possible missed opportunities for diagnosing colorectal cancer in Dutch primary care: a multimethods approach

机译:可能错过荷兰初级保健中诊断结直肠癌的机会:多国内方法方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background & para;& para;Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is important to achieve better survival. Discriminating symptoms suggestive of CRC from benign conditions is a challenge for GPs because most known 'alarm symptoms' have low predictive values.& para;& para;Aim & para;& para;To further understand the diagnostic process of CRC in general practice in terms of healthcare use and by analysing factors related to diagnostic intervals.& para;& para;Design and setting & para;& para;A multimethod approach comprising a historical, prospective registry study and qualitative content analysis.& para;& para;Method & para;& para;Healthcare use in the year before referral for colonoscopy was compared between patients diagnosed with CRC and an age-, sex,- and GP-matched control population. Qualitative content analysis was performed on free texts in electronic patient records from a purposive sample of patients with CRC.& para;& para;Results & para;& para;Patients with CRC (n = 287) had 41% (25-59%) more face-to-face contacts and 21% (7-37%) more medication prescriptions than controls (n = 828). Forty-six per cent of patients with CRC had two or more contacts for digestive reasons, compared with 12.2% of controls, more often for symptoms than diagnoses. From qualitative analysis two themes emerged: 'possible missed diagnostic opportunities' and 'improvements in diagnostic process unlikely'. Possible missed diagnostic opportunities were related to patients waiting before presenting symptoms, doctors attributing symptoms to comorbid conditions or medication use, or doctors sticking to an initial diagnosis.& para;& para;Conclusion & para;& para;Fewer missed diagnostic opportunities might occur if GPs are aware of pitfalls in diagnosing CRC: the assumption that symptoms are caused by comorbid conditions or medication, or relating complaints to pre-existing medical conditions. GPs also need to be aware that repeated digestive complaints warrant rethinking an earlier diagnosis.
机译:背景与律师;&段;早期检测结直肠癌(CRC)对于实现更好的存活是重要的。歧视症状来自良性条件的CRC是对GPS的挑战,因为大多数已知的“警报症状”具有低的预测值。&Para;&Para; AIM¶¶为了进一步了解CRC在一般实践中的诊断过程医疗保健条款和通过分析与诊断间隔相关的因素。&段;&段;设计和设置和议案;¶一种多算法的方法,包括历史,前瞻性注册研究和定性内容分析。¶¶方法¶¶在诊断出CRC和年龄,性别,和GP匹配的控制人口的患者之间比较了结肠镜检查前一年的医疗保健使用。对来自CRC患者的目的样本的电子患者记录中的自由文本进行了定性含量分析。&段;结果&Para;&Para;¶ CRC(n = 287)的患者有41%(25-59%) )更多面对面的接触和21%(7-37%)的药物处方比对照(n = 828)。 46%的CRC患者有两种或更多的消化原因接触,与12.2%的对照相比,症状多于诊断。从定性分析出现了两个主题:“可能错过诊断机会”和“不太可能的诊断过程的改进”。可能错过的诊断机会与等待之前的患者有关,然后归因于症状,归因于同种式体的病症或药物使用的症状,或者医生粘附于初步诊断。&段;结论和议案;&段;&段;&段;较少的错过诊断机会可能会发生如果GPS意识到诊断CRC中的陷阱:假设症状是由合并症或药物治疗引起的,或将投诉与预先存在的医疗状况相关。 GPS还需要意识到重复的消化投诉令重新思考早期的诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号