...
首页> 外文期刊>The Foot >Comparison of plantar pressure distribution in CAD–CAM and prefabricated foot orthoses in patients with flexible flatfeet
【24h】

Comparison of plantar pressure distribution in CAD–CAM and prefabricated foot orthoses in patients with flexible flatfeet

机译:CAD-CAM中Pharorar压力分布的比较和柔性平底钳患者预制脚矫形器

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highlights ? Both CAD–CAM and prefabricated foot orthoses distribute pressure in the same pattern in patients with flexible flatfeet. ? Special design of CAD–CAM insole could not make big differences in plantar pressure distribution. ? Further research is required to determine whether different scan systems or design software have effect on plantar pressure distribution. Abstract Backgrounds The effect of foot orthoses on plantar pressure distribution has been proven by researchers but there are some controversies about advantages of custom-made foot orthoses to less expensive prefabricated foot orthoses. Methods Nineteen flatfeet adults between 18 and 45 participated in this study. CAD–CAM foot orthoses were made for these patients according to their foot scan. Prefabricated foot orthoses were prepared according to their foot size. Plantar pressure, force and contact area were measured using pedar ? -x in-shoe system wearing shoe alone, wearing CAD–CAM foot orthoses and wearing prefabricated foot orthoses. Repeated measures ANOVA model with post-hoc, Bonferroni comparison were used to test differences. Results CAD–CAM and prefabricated foot orthoses both decreased pressure and force under 2nd, 3–5 metatarsal and heel regions comparing to shoe alone condition. CAD–CAM foot orthosis increased pressure under lateral toe region in comparison to shoe alone and prefabricated foot orthosis. Both foot orthoses increased pressure and contact area in medial midfoot region comparing to shoe alone condition. Increased forces were seen at hallux and lateral toes by prefabricated foot orthoses in comparison with CAD–CAM foot orthoses and control condition, respectively. Conclusion According to the results, both foot orthoses could decrease the pressure under heel and metatarsal area. It seems that the special design of CAD–CAM foot orthoses could not make great differences in plantar pressure distribution in this sample. Further research is required to determine whether these results are associated with different scan systems or design software.
机译:强调 ? CAD-CAM和预制脚均以柔性FLATFEET的患者中的相同模式分布压力。还CAD-CAM鞋垫的特殊设计无法在Portorar压力分布中产生大的差异。还需要进一步的研究来确定不同的扫描系统或设计软件是否对跖骨压力分布产生影响。摘要背景,研究人员已经证明了脚逆向脚偏离对跖骨压力分布的影响,但定制的脚偏离较便宜的预制脚偏离的优势存在一些争议。方法在本研究中18至45岁之间的19个平台成年人。根据脚部扫描,为这些患者制作CAD-CAM脚矫形器。预制的脚,根据脚尺寸制备。使用PEDAR测量Purtorar压力,力和接触面积? -X鞋内系统戴着鞋子,穿着CAD-CAM脚,穿着预制的脚矫形器。重复测量HOC后HOC的ANOVA模型用于测试差异。结果CAD-CAM和预制脚透露2N,3-5个跖骨和鞋跟区域下降的压力和力量,与鞋子单独的条件相比。与单独的鞋子和预制的脚矫形器相比,CAD-CAM脚矫形器增加了侧向脚趾区域下的压力。双脚偏离的压力和接触面积在中脚区域中的内侧区域与单独的鞋子相比。通过预制的脚垂直于与CAD-CAM脚偏离和控制条件相比,在Hallux和侧向脚趾上看到增加力。结论根据结果,双脚矫形器可降低脚跟和跖骨区域下的压力。似乎CAD-CAM脚的特殊设计偏离此样品中的跖骨压力分布无法产生巨大差异。需要进一步的研究来确定这些结果是否与不同的扫描系统或设计软件相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号