首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Surgery >Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI
【24h】

Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI

机译:辐射瘤方法,以区分良好分化的唇膏和Lipomas对MRI

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) can be difficult to distinguish from lipoma. Currently, this distinction is made by testing for MDM2 amplification, which requires a biopsy. The aim of this study was to develop a noninvasive method to predict MDM2 amplification status using radiomics features derived from MRI. Methods: Patients with an MDM2-negative lipoma or MDM2-positive WDLPS and a pretreatment T1-weighted MRI scan who were referred to Erasmus MC between 2009 and 2018 were included. When available, other MRI sequences were included in the radiomics analysis. Features describing intensity, shape and texture were extracted from the tumour region. Classification was performed using various machine learning approaches. Evaluation was performed through a 100 times random-split cross-validation. The performance of the models was compared with the performance of three expert radiologists. Results: The data set included 116 tumours (58 patients with lipoma, 58 with WDLPS) and originated from 41 different MRI scanners, resulting in wide heterogeneity in imaging hardware and acquisition protocols. The radiomics model based on T1 imaging features alone resulted in a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83, sensitivity of 0.68 and specificity of 0.84. Adding the T2-weighted imaging features in an explorative analysis improved the model to a mean AUC of 0.89, sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.88. The three radiologists scored an AUC of 0.74 and 0.72 and 0.61 respectively; a sensitivity of 0.74, 0.91 and 0.64; and a specificity of 0.55, 0.36 and 0.59. Conclusion: Radiomics is a promising, non-invasive method for differentiating between WDLPS and lipoma, outperforming the scores of the radiologists. Further optimization and validation is needed before introduction into clinical practice.
机译:背景:分化良好的脂质瘤(WDLP)可能难以区分脂肪瘤。目前,这种区别是通过测试MDM2扩增,这需要一种活检。本研究的目的是开发一种非侵入性方法,用于使用源自MRI的射线组虫特征来预测MDM2扩增状态。方法:患有MDM2阴性脂肪瘤或MDM2阳性WDLP的患者及2009年至2018年间在Erasmus MC中提到的预处理T1加权MRI扫描。当可用时,其他MRI序列被包括在辐射瘤分析中。从肿瘤区域提取描述强度,形状和质地的特征。使用各种机器学习方法进行分类。评估通过随机分裂交叉验证100次进行。将模型的性能与三个专家放射科医师的性能进行了比较。结果:数据集包括116例肿瘤(58例脂肪瘤,58例,WDLPS),起源于41个不同的MRI扫描仪,导致成像硬件和采集协议中的异质性。基于T1成像特征的基于T1成像特征的辐射瘤模型导致曲线(AUC)的平均面积为0.83,灵敏度为0.68,特异性为0.84。在探索性分析中添加T2加权成像特征将模型改进为0.89的平均AUC,灵敏度为0.74,特异性为0.88。三位放射科医生分别均分别达到0.74和0.72和0.61的AUC;灵敏度为0.74,0.91和0.64;特异性0.55,0.36和0.59。结论:辐射瘤是一种有希望的非侵入性方法,用于区分WDLP和脂肪瘤,优于放射科学家的分数。在临床实践中之前需要进一步优化和验证。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The British Journal of Surgery》 |2019年第13期|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Erasmus MC Canc Inst Dept Med Oncol Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Canc Inst Dept Med Oncol Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Dept Pathol Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Canc Inst Dept Surg Oncol Room Na 2117 POB 2040 NL-3000 CA Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Canc Inst Dept Med Oncol Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Canc Inst Dept Surg Oncol Room Na 2117 POB 2040 NL-3000 CA Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Erasmus MC Dept Radiol &

    Nucl Med Rotterdam Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 外科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号