...
首页> 外文期刊>The American surgeon. >Failure Rate of Prehospital Needle Decompression for Tension Pneumothorax in Trauma Patients
【24h】

Failure Rate of Prehospital Needle Decompression for Tension Pneumothorax in Trauma Patients

机译:创伤患者张力肺炎的预孢子针减压失效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tension pneumothorax is commonly treated with needle decompression (ND) at the 2nd intercostal space midclavicular line (2nd ICS MCL) but is thought to have a high failure rate. Few studies have attempted to directly measure the failure rate in patients receiving the intervention. We performed a retrospective analysis of 10 years of patients receiving prehospital ND. CT scans were reviewed to record the location of catheters left indwelling and the proportion of patients who did not have any pneumothorax. Chest wall thickness was measured on both injured and uninjured sides at the 2nd ICS MCL and compared with the recommended alternative, the 5th ICS anterior axillary line (5th ICS AAL). We identified 335 patients that underwent prehospital ND who had CT scans performed. Using our two different radiologic methods of assessing failure, 39 per cent and 76 per cent of attempts at ND failed to reach the pleural space. In addition, at least 39 per cent of patients did not have a tension pneumothorax. Injured chest walls were significantly thicker than uninjured chest walls at both the 2nd ICS MCL and the 5th ICS AAL (both P < 0.005.) Increasing chest wall thickness correlated with the failure of the catheter to reach the pleural space. Using an 8-cm catheter at the 5th ICS AAL, iatrogenic cardiac injury was at risk in 42 per cent of patients. This series confirms the high failure rate of ND at the 2nd ICS MCL, but further studies are needed to assure the safety of using larger catheters at the 5th ICS AAL.
机译:在第二肋间空间中载线(第2 IC MCL)的针尖减压(ND)通常用针尖减压(ND)处理张力肺炎,但被认为具有高的故障率。很少有研究试图直接测量接受干预患者的失败率。我们对接受预科Nd的10年患者进行了回顾性分析。审查了CT扫描以记录导管的位置留下留置,患者的比例没有任何肺炎。在第二IC MCL上的受损和未加注的侧面测量胸壁厚度,并与推荐的替代方案,第五IC前腋线(第5 IC AA1)进行比较。我们确定了335名患者,接受了CT扫描的预期ND。使用我们两种不同的评估失败的放射学方法,39%和76%的ND尝试未能达到胸膜空间。此外,至少39%的患者没有紧张肺炎。受伤的胸壁在第二IC MCL和第五ICS AAL(P <0.005)中的胸壁上显着厚。增加胸壁厚度与导管的失效相当到达胸腔空间。在第五IC AAL使用8厘米导管,治理心脏损伤有42%的患者的风险。该系列确认了第2 IC MCL处的ND的高故障率,但需要进一步的研究来确保在第五IC AAL处使用较大导管的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号