首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Psychology >Interference Effects, Age, and the Spacing Benefit
【24h】

Interference Effects, Age, and the Spacing Benefit

机译:干扰效应,年龄和间距益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Improving memory is a high priority for many. One strategy that reliably improves long-term memory is spacing of learning. Using a within-subject cued recall task, we compared recall of 50 weakly associated word pairs in older (55-89 years) and younger (18-22 years) adults across 3 different spaced trials with constant temporal gaps but of varying types of interference (related, unrelated, none). Two control conditions were also included (massed- and single-presentation word pairs). We measured recall performance after a brief delay. During training, recall was lowest for the words in the related interference condition with the remaining groups statistically equal, and younger adults showed better overall performance compared with older adults. At test, both groups showed comparable spacing benefits (with no performance differences between interference conditions), and older adults' performance equaled that of younger adults. It appears that delay, and not type of interference during the delay, was critical to the spacing benefit.
机译:改善内存是许多人的高优先级。一个可靠地改善长期记忆的一个策略是学习的间隔。在受试者内部召回任务中,我们将召回50个弱相关的词对(55-89岁)和年轻(18-22岁)的成年人进行比较,横跨3种不同的间隔试验,具有恒定的时间间隙,而是不同类型的干扰(相关,无关,无)。还包括两个控制条件(大规模和单呈现字对)。在短暂延迟后,我们测量了召回性能。在培训期间,召回与相关的干扰条件中的单词最低,剩余群体统计上等于统计数据,而年轻人与老年人相比表现出更好的整体表现。在测试时,两组都显示出可比的间距益处(干扰条件之间没有性能差异),老年人的性能与年龄较小的成年人相等。它似乎延迟,延迟期间的干扰类型对间距益处至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号