首页> 外文期刊>Urban Forestry & Urban Greening >Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data
【24h】

Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data

机译:在使用不足的数据面前城市绿色空间管理挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Effective urban planning, and urban green space management in particular, require proper data on urban green spaces. The potential of urban green spaces to provide benefits to urban inhabitants (ecosystem services) depends on whether they are managed as a comprehensive system of urban green infrastructure, or as isolated islands falling under the responsibility of different stakeholders. Meanwhile, different urban green space datasets are based on different definitions, data sources, sampling techniques, time periods and scales, which poses important challenges to urban green infrastructure planning, management and research. Using the case study of Lodz, the third largest city in Poland, and an additional analysis of 17 other Polish cities, we compare data from five publicly available sources: 1) public statistics, 2) the national land surveying agency, 3) satellite imagery (Landsat data), 4) the Urban Atlas, 5) the Open Street Map. The results reveal large differences in the total amount of urban green spaces in the cities as depicted in different datasets. In Lodz, the narrowly interpreted public statistics data, which are aspatial, suggest that green spaces account for only 12.8% of city area, while the most comprehensive dataset from the national land surveying agency reveals the figure of 61.2%. The former dataset, which excludes many types of green spaces (such as arable land, private and informal green spaces), is still the most commonly used. The analysis of the 17 other cities confirms the same pattern. This results in broader institutional failures related to urban green infrastructure planning, management, and research, including a lack of awareness of green space quality (e.g. connectivity) and benefits (ecosystem services), and the related political disregard for urban green spaces. Our comparison suggests that a better understanding of green space data sources is necessary in urban planning, and especially when planning urban green infrastructure.
机译:特别是城市规划,特别是城市绿地管理,需要对城市绿地的适当数据。城市绿地为城市居民提供福利(生态系统服务)的潜力取决于他们是否被作为城市绿色基础设施的综合制度,或孤立的岛屿落在不同利益相关者的责任下。同时,不同的城市绿色空间数据集基于不同的定义,数据源,采样技术,时间段和规模,对城市绿色基础设施规划,管理和研究构成了重要挑战。利用波兰第三大城市罗兹的案例研究,以及对17个其他波兰城市的额外分析,我们将数据与五个公共可用来源的数据进行比较:1)公共统计,2)国家土地测量机构,3)卫星图像(Landsat数据),4)城市地图集,5)开放的街道地图。结果显示了城市中城市绿地总量的巨大差异,如不同的数据集中所示。在Lodz,狭隘的公众统计数据,即天花,建议绿色空间仅占城区的12.8%,而国家土地测量机构的最全面的数据集揭示了61.2%的数字。前数据集排除了许多类型的绿色空间(例如耕地,私人和非正式绿色空间),仍然是最常用的。对其他17个城市的分析证实了相同的模式。这导致与城市绿色基础设施规划,管理和研究相关的更广泛的机构失败,包括缺乏对绿地质量的认识(例如连接)和福利(生态系统服务),以及城市绿地的相关政治无视。我们的比较表明,在城市规划中需要更好地了解绿地空间数据来源,特别是在规划城市绿色基础设施时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号