...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychoneuroendocrinology: An International Journal >Cookie or Clementine? Psychophysiological stress reactivity and recovery after eating healthy and unhealthy comfort foods
【24h】

Cookie or Clementine? Psychophysiological stress reactivity and recovery after eating healthy and unhealthy comfort foods

机译:饼干或柑橘? 吃健康和不健康的舒适食物后的精神生理压力反应性和恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Many people eat unhealthy foods that are high in calories, fat, or sugar when feeling stressed, yet little is known about whether this unhealthy comfort eating actually comforts. Additionally, prior research has not tested whether healthy comfort eating of fruits and vegetables might also alleviate stress, or whether comfort eating during the stress anticipation phase versus immediately after a stressful event is more beneficial for stress relief. The present experiment tested whether unhealthy and healthy comfort eating reduce acute psychophysiological responses to a socially evaluative stressor. Participants (N - 150 healthy women) underwent the Trier Social Stress Test in the lab and were randomly assigned to one of five conditions according to a 2 (food type: unhealthy vs. healthy) x 2 (eating timing: during stress anticipation vs. after the stressor) + 1 (no food control) between-subjects design. Stress outcomes included mood, cognitive appraisals, rumination, salivary cortisol, heart rate variability, and pre-ejection period. Unhealthy and healthy comfort eating did not dampen reactivity or enhance recovery of psychophysiological stress compared to control, and no differences in reactivity or recovery were found by comfort food type. Findings suggest that by replacing unhealthy comfort foods with fruits and vegetables, women will not be sacrificing any stress-reducing benefits and can inherently improve the quality of their diet while avoiding potential drawbacks of unhealthy comfort eating (e.g., links with abdominal obesity).
机译:许多人吃了不健康的食物,当感到压力时,脂肪或糖很高,但对这种不健康的舒适性居住地舒适感到困难。此外,目前的研究尚未测试健康的舒适性饮食水果和蔬菜是否可能减轻压力,或者在压力事件发生压力事件后立即对压力预期相位相比舒适进食是否对压力缓解更有利。目前的实验检测了对社会评价压力源的不健康和健康的舒适性是否会降低急性心理生理响应。参与者(N - 150健康的女性)在实验室中进行了Thrier社会压力测试,根据A 2(食物类型:不健康与健康)X 2随机分配到五种条件中的一个(饮食时间:压力预期期间与在应激源之后)+ 1(无食物控制)之间的主体设计。压力结果包括情绪,认知评估,谣言,唾液酸纤溶酶,心率变异性和预喷射期。不健康和健康的舒适性饮食并未抑制反应性或增强与对照相比的心理生理胁迫的恢复,并且通过舒适的食物类型发现反应性或回收率的差异。调查结果表明,通过用水果和蔬菜取代不健康的舒适食品,妇女不会牺牲任何压力降低的益处,并且可以在避免不健康舒适性的潜在缺点时固有地提高饮食的质量(例如,与腹部肥胖的联系)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号