...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology and aging >Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Effort: Pupil Response Distinguishes Reappraisal and Distraction for Older But Not Younger Adults
【24h】

Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Effort: Pupil Response Distinguishes Reappraisal and Distraction for Older But Not Younger Adults

机译:情绪调节努力的年龄差异:瞳孔反应区分重新评估和患者的分心,但不是年轻的成年人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In previous research, older adults show greater emotional benefits from distracting themselves than from reappraising an event when strategically regulating emotion. Older adults also demonstrate an attentional preference to avoid, while younger adults show a bias toward approaching negative stimuli. This suggests a possible age-related differentiation of cognitive effort across approach and avoidance of negative stimuli during emotion regulation. In this study, we tracked cognitive effort via pupil dilation during the use of distraction (avoidance) and reappraisal (approach) strategies across age. Forty-eight younger adults (M = 20.94, SD = 1.78; 19 men) and 48 older adults (M = 68.82, SD = 5.40; 15 men) viewed a slideshow of negative images and were instructed to distract, reappraise, or passively view each image. Older adults showed greater pupil dilation during reappraisal than distraction, but younger adults displayed no difference between conditions-an effect that survived when controlling for gaze patterns. Gaze findings revealed that older adults looked less within images during active emotion regulation compared with passive viewing (no difference between distraction and reappraisal), and younger adults showed no difference across strategies. Younger adults gazed less within the most emotional image areas during distraction, but this did not significantly contribute to pupil response. Our findings support that distraction is less cognitively effortful than reinterpreting negative information in later life. These findings could be explained by older adults' motivational bias to disengage from negative information because of the age-related positivity effect, or compensation for decreased working memory resources across the life span.
机译:在以前的研究中,老年人表现出更大的情绪益处,而不是在战略性调节情绪时重新获得活动。老年人还表明了避免的注意偏好,而年轻人则表现出接近负刺激的偏见。这表明在情绪调节期间,在接近的方法和避免对负刺激的情况下可能的年龄相关的分化。在这项研究中,我们在使用分心(避免)和跨年龄的重新评估(方法)策略期间,通过瞳孔扩张跟踪认知努力。四十八个年轻的成年人(M = 20.94,SD = 1.78; 19人)和48名老年人(M = 68.82,SD = 5.40; 15名男子)观看了负面图像的幻灯片,并被指示分散,重新留下或被动地观察每个图像。老年人在重新评估过程中表现出更大的瞳孔扩张而不是分散注意力,但在控制凝视图案时,较年轻的成年人没有差异 - 这种效果在控制凝视图案时幸存下来。凝视发现显示,与被动观察相比,老年人在积极情绪调节期间看起来较少看起来较少(分心和重新评估的无差异),并且较年轻的成年人在策略中没有差异。在分心期间,年轻的成年人凝视着少于情绪化的地区,但这对瞳孔反应没有显着贡献。我们的调查结果支持,分心不如重新诠释后续生活中的负面信息的努力。由于年龄相关的积极效应,或者在寿命中减少工作内存资源的补偿,这些发现可以通过老年人的激励偏见来解释,以便从负面信息中脱离负面信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号