首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Effort: Pupil Response Distinguishes Reappraisal and Distraction for Older but not Younger Adults
【2h】

Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Effort: Pupil Response Distinguishes Reappraisal and Distraction for Older but not Younger Adults

机译:情绪调节努力的年龄差异:学生的反应区分了对老年人的重新评估和分心而不是年轻人

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In previous research, older adults show greater emotional benefits from distracting themselves than from reappraising an event when strategically regulating emotion. Older adults also demonstrate an attentional preference to avoid, while younger adults show a bias towards approaching negative stimuli. This suggests a possible age-related differentiation of cognitive effort across approach and avoidance of negative stimuli during emotion regulation. In this study we tracked cognitive effort via pupil dilation during the use of distraction (avoidance) and reappraisal (approach) strategies across age. Forty-eight younger adults (M = 20.94, SD= 1.78; 19 male) and 48 older adults (M = 68.82, SD=5.40; 15 male) viewed a slideshow of negative images, and were instructed to distract, reappraise, or passively view each image. Older adults showed greater pupil dilation during reappraisal than distraction, but younger adults displayed no difference between conditions— an effect that survived when controlling for gaze patterns. Gaze findings revealed that older adults looked less within images during active emotion regulation compared to passive viewing (no difference between distraction and reappraisal), and younger adults showed no difference across strategies. Younger adults gazed less within the most emotional image areas during distraction, but this did not significantly contribute to pupil response. Our findings support that distraction is less cognitively effortful than reinterpreting negative information in later-life. These findings could be explained by older adults’ motivational bias to disengage from negative information due to the age-related positivity effect, or compensation for decreased working memory resources across the lifespan.
机译:在先前的研究中,与策略性地调节情绪时,重新分配事件相比,老年人从分散注意力中获得更大的情绪收益。老年人也表现出注意避免的注意偏好,而年轻人则表现出趋向于负面刺激的倾向。这表明在方法和避免情绪调节过程中避免负面刺激方面,认知努力可能与年龄有关。在这项研究中,我们追踪了在整个年龄段中使用注意力分散(回避)和重新评估(接近)策略时瞳孔扩大所产生的认知努力。 48位年轻成年人(M = 20.94,SD = 1.78; 19位男性)和48位成年人(M = 68.82,SD = 5.40; 15位男性)观看了负片幻灯片,并被指示分散注意力,重新评估或被动地观看查看每个图像。年龄较大的成年人在重新评估过程中的瞳孔扩张程度大于分心,但年龄较小的成年人之间的状况无差异,这种现象在控制注视方式时得以幸存。凝视的发现表明,与被动观看相比,在主动情绪调节过程中,老年人在图像中看得更少(分心和重新评估之间没有差异),而年轻人在策略上也没有差异。在分心期间,年轻人在最情绪化的图像区域内的凝视较少,但这并没有显着促进瞳孔反应。我们的研究结果表明,分心在认知上的努力不如在以后的生活中重新解释负面信息。这些发现可能是由于老年人由于与年龄相关的积极影响而倾向于脱离负面信息的动机偏见,或者是对整个生命周期内工作记忆资源减少的补偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号