...
首页> 外文期刊>Quintessence international >Long-term randomized clinical trial evaluating the effects of fixture surface acid-etching and machined collar design on bone healing
【24h】

Long-term randomized clinical trial evaluating the effects of fixture surface acid-etching and machined collar design on bone healing

机译:长期随机临床试验评估夹具表面酸蚀刻和加工轴环设计对骨愈合的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: An implant with an acid-etched fixture surface and internal-hex collar may achieve greater osseointegration. The goal of this research was to study the effects on long-term bone healing of fixture surface acid-etching and machined collar design. Method and Materials: Three two-part implant types were compared: standard Branemark (with an external-hex 1.2 mm long machined flat collar), Swede-Vent (a copy of the Branemark design, with an identical collar but a fixture surface acid-etched to 1 to 3 mu m), and Screw-Vent (with a fixture surface acid-etched identically to that of Swede-Vent, but a longer internal-hex machined flat collar that did not require countersinking). Fifty-eight subjects each received the three types in alternate fashion at five sites between mental foramen, and a fixed full-arch prosthesis. Abutment-implant interface/ microgap (MG) was placed at the crest, and first bone-to-implant contact point-to microgap (fBIC-MG) was measured at mesial and distal sides of each implant. Mean fBIC-MG values were compared after 15 to 20 years of function. Statistical analysis was based on the mixed linear model with the level of significance set at P .05 and Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons. Results: Branemark had less mean marginal bone loss (-1.08 mm, standard error [SE] 0.20) compared with Swede-Vent (-1.28 mm, SE 0.20), but pairwise comparisons showed that the difference was not statistically significant (mean difference of 0.20 mm, P = .662). Screw-Vent had the greatest loss (-1.92 mm, SE 0.20), and pairwise comparisons showed that the difference was statistically significant compared with Branemark and Swede-Vent (difference = 0.64 mm, P .001). Conclusion: According to accepted standards for osseointegration, all three implant types achieved very acceptable long-term results. However, while Branemark had the least bone loss, the implant with the acidetched fixture surface and longer internal-hex collar design had the greatest loss. Within the confines of this study, shorter collar length of 1.2 mm may be more important to limit long-term bone loss with microgap placed at the crest.
机译:目的:具有酸蚀刻夹具表面和内六圈套环的植入物可以实现更大的骨整合。该研究的目标是研究夹具表面酸蚀刻和加工轴环设计的长期骨愈合的影响。方法和材料:比较三种两部分植入物类型:标准Branemark(带外六角1.2毫米长加工的平面领),瑞德通风口(Branemark设计的副本,具有相同的衣领,但夹具表面酸 - 蚀刻到1至3μm)和螺旋通风口(用夹具表面酸蚀刻到瑞德通风口的酸蚀刻,而是较长的内六角机加工的扁平环,其不需要埋头孔)。五十八名受试者各自在精神粉末之间的五个地点和固定的全拱假体之间接收了三种类型的交替方式。静脉注入界面/微胶(Mg)置于嵴处,并在每个植入物的间隙和远侧侧测量第一骨对植入的接触点至微胶(FBIC-MG)。在15至20年的功能后比较了平均FBIC-Mg值。统计学分析基于混合线性模型,其具有P&LT的显着性水平。 .05和Bonferroni对成对比较的校正。结果:与SWEDE - 通风口相比,Branemark具有较少的边缘骨损失(-1.08 mm,标准误差[SE] 0.20),但成对比较表明差异没有统计学意义(平均差异0.20 mm,p = .662)。螺旋通风口具有最大的损失(-1.92 mm,SE 0.20),并且成对比较表明,与Branemark和Swede-end(差异= 0.64mm,P& .001)相比,差异是统计学意义。结论:根据骨整合的接受标准,所有三种植入物类型都取得了非常可接受的长期结果。然而,虽然Branemark骨质损失最小,但植入物与酸性夹具表面和较长的内六进制项圈设计具有最大的损失。在本研究的范围内,较短的套环长度为1.2毫米可能更为重要,以限制在嵴处放置微涂层的长期骨质损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号