...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions
【24h】

Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions

机译:具有服务不足的患者人口的敏感健康主题:在线焦点小组讨论的方法论考虑因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Online focus group discussions provide an anonymous environment to assess sensitive, health-related experiences that may be difficult to discuss utilizing traditional face-to-face modalities, particularly for marginalized populations such as female-to-male trans masculine (TM) transgender individuals. This article reviews the history, advantages, and disadvantages of online focus groups, with an emphasis for research about sensitive issues with stigmatized, rare, and/or geographically dispersed patient populations. The article then evaluates the success of online focus group discussions as a case study using data from four asynchronous online focus groups conducted between September 2015 and February 2016 that explored topics related to sexual health care access with U.S. TM adults ( N = 29). The rationale for selecting an asynchronous online methodology is described along with the unique methodological considerations that emerged in developing the study protocol. We conclude by sharing lessons learned, including innovations for maximizing participant engagement and comfort to elicit rich qualitative data.
机译:在线焦点小组讨论提供了一种匿名环境,以评估可能难以利用传统面对面的方式讨论的敏感,健康相关的经验,特别是对于雌性对雄性反式男性(TM)变性个人的边缘化群体。本文审查了在线焦点​​小组的历史,优势和缺点,重点是关于耻辱,罕见和/或地理上分散的患者群体的敏感问题的研究。然后,该文章评估了在线焦点​​小组讨论的成功作为使用来自2015年9月至2016年9月至2016年2月至2016年2月至2016年2月之间进行的四个异步在线焦点小组的案例研究,该探讨了与美国TM成年人有关的有关的有关的主题(n = 29)。选择用于选择异步在线方法的理由以及在开发研究方案方面出现的独特的方法考虑。我们通过分享经验教训的结论,包括最大化参与者参与和舒适的创新,以引发富裕的定性数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号