首页> 外文OA文献 >Content Analysis of Online Focus Group Discussions are a Valid and Feasible Mode When Investigating Sensitive Topics Among Young Persons With a Cancer Experience
【2h】

Content Analysis of Online Focus Group Discussions are a Valid and Feasible Mode When Investigating Sensitive Topics Among Young Persons With a Cancer Experience

机译:在调查有癌症经历的年轻人中的敏感话题时,在线焦点小组讨论的内容分析是一种有效且可行的模式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Clinical research often lacks participants of young age. Adding to the small amount of scientific studies that focus on the population entering adulthood, there are also difficulties to recruit them. To overcome this, there is a need to develop and scientifically evaluate modes for data collection that are suitable for adolescents and young adults. With this in mind we performed 39 online focus group discussions among young survivors of childhood cancer to explore thoughts and experiences around dating, being intimate with someone, and having children. ududOBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate online focus group discussions as a mode for data collection on sensitive issues among young persons with a cancer experience. ududMETHODS: One hundred thirty-three young persons (16-25 years) previously diagnosed with cancer, participated in 39 synchronous online focus group discussions (response rate 134/369, 36%). The mode of administration was evaluated by analyzing participant characteristics and interactions during discussions, as well as group members' evaluations of the discussions. ududRESULTS: Persons diagnosed with central nervous tumors (n=30, 27%) participated to a lower extent than those with other cancer types (n=103, 39%; χ 2= 4.89, P=.03). The participants described various health impairments that correspond to what would be expected among cancer survivors including neuropsychiatric conditions and writing disabilities. Even though participants were interested in others' experiences, sexual issues needed more probing by the moderators than did fertility-related issues. Group evaluations revealed that participants appreciated communicating on the suggested topics and thought that it was easier to discuss sex when it was possible to be anonymous toward other group members. ududCONCLUSIONS: Online focus group discussions, with anonymous participation, are suggested to be a feasible and valid mode for collecting sensitive data among young persons with a cancer experience.
机译:背景:临床研究通常缺乏年轻参与者。除了针对成年人口的少量科学研究之外,还很难招募他们。为了克服这个问题,需要开发和科学地评估适合于青少年和年轻人的数据收集模式。考虑到这一点,我们在儿童期癌症的年轻幸存者中进行了39个在线焦点小组讨论,以探讨约会,与某人亲密和生孩子的想法和经验。 ud ud目标:这项研究的目的是评估在线焦点小组的讨论,以此作为收集有癌症经历的年轻人中敏感问题的数据的一种模式。方法:先前被诊断出患有癌症的133名年轻人(16-25岁)参加了39项同步在线焦点小组讨论(响应率134/369,36%)。通过分析讨论过程中参与者的特征和互动以及小组成员对讨论的评估来评估管理模式。结果:被诊断出患有中枢神经肿瘤的人(n = 30,27%)的参与程度低于其他癌症类型(n = 103,39%;χ2 = 4.89,P = .03)。参与者描述了各种健康损害,这些损害对应于癌症幸存者所预期的损害,包括神经精神病和书写障碍。尽管参与者对他人的经历感兴趣,但与生育相关的问题相比,主持人更需要探讨性问题。小组评估显示,参与者很乐意就建议的话题进行交流,并认为当对其他小组成员匿名时,讨论性行为会更容易。 ud ud结论:建议在匿名参加的情况下进行在线焦点小组讨论,这是一种在患有癌症的年轻人中收集敏感数据的可行且有效的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号