...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >A Critique of O’Byrne’s Understanding of Ethnography and the Politics of Public Health Research
【24h】

A Critique of O’Byrne’s Understanding of Ethnography and the Politics of Public Health Research

机译:O'Byrne对民族志的理解批判和公共卫生研究的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Patrick O’Byrne criticizes the use of ethnography in public health research focused on cultural groups. His main argument is that ethnography disciplines marginalized populations that do not respect the imperative of health. In this article, I argue that O’Byrne has an erroneous understanding of ethnography and the politics of scientific research. My main argument is that a methodology itself cannot discipline individuals. I argue that if data are used as a basis to develop problematic public health policies, the issue is the policies themselves and not the methodology used to collect the data. While O’Byrne discourages researchers from conducting health research like ethnography focused on cultural groups, I argue the exact opposite. This has to do with justice and equity for marginalized communities and the obligation to tailor health services for their specific needs, which may not be the same as those of the general population.
机译:Patrick O'Byrne批评了在公共卫生研究中的使用,专注于文化群体。 他的主要论点是,民族志学科不尊重健康的必要性的边缘化群体。 在本文中,我认为O'Byrne对民族志的理解有着错误的了解和科学研究的政治。 我的主要论点是,方法本身不能纪律个人。 我认为,如果数据被用作制定有问题的公共卫生政策的基础,则该问题是单独的政策,而不是用于收集数据的方法。 虽然O'Byrne不鼓励研究人员,如民族识别的重点是文化群体,但我争辩说。 这与边缘化社区的司法和公平有关,并为其具体需求定制卫生服务的义务,这可能与一般人群的特定需求相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号